|
Henry Popple's Map of the British Empire in North
America (London, 1733) Mark Babinski Edited by Matthew H. Edney Notes to the Narrative After reviewing the notes, please use the "back" button to return to the main text. | |||||
| Note 1 | JOHN ADAMS' 1776 LETTER TO WIFE ABIGAIL MENTIONING POPPLE'S AND A NUMBER OF
OTHER MAPS (Adams 1776-78, 90-92): "Philadelphia Aug 13. 1776. Geography is a Branch of
Knowledge, not only very usefull, but absolutely necessary, to every Person of Public Character whether in
civil or military Life. Nay it is equally necessary for Merchants. America is our Country, and therefore a
minute Knowledge of its Geography, is most important to Us and our Children. The Board of War are
making a Collection of all the Maps of America, and of every Part of it, which are extant, to be hung up in
the War Office. As soon as the Collection is compleated, I will send you a List of it. In the mean Time take
an Account of a few already collected and framed and hung up in the Room. A Chart of North and South
America […] [by John Green]. A Map of the British and French Dominions in North America with the
Roads, Distances, Limits and Extent of the Settlements,[…] by […] John Mitchell. A Map of the most
inhabited Part of New England […] [by John Green]. A new and accurate Map of North America, drawn
from the famous Mr. D'Anville, with Improvements from the best English Maps, and engraved by R.W.
Seale […] by Peter Bell Geor - printed for Carington Bowles […] published 1. Jany. 1771. […] Map of the
Province of Pensilvania […] by […] W. Scull. A General Map of the Middle British Colonies, in America
[…] By Lewis Evans 1755. Dedicated to T. Pownal Esqr. whom Evans calls the best Judge of it in America.
[…] Map of the improved Part of the Province of Pensilvania […] by Nicholas Scull. You will ask me why
I trouble you with all these dry Titles, and Dedications of Maps. - I answer, that I may turn the Attention of
the Family to the subject of American Geography. - Really, there ought not to be a State, a City, a
Promontory, a River, an Harbour, an Inlett, or a Mountain in all America, but what should be intimately
known to every Youth, who has any Pretensions to liberal Education. I Am. N.B. Popples Map is not
mentioned here, which was dedicated to Queen Ann, and is recommended by Dr. Hawley [sic]. - It is the
largest I ever saw, and the most distinct. Not very accurate. It is Eight foot square. - There is one in the
Pensilvania State House." | |||||
| Note 2 | FRANKLIN'S 1748 REFERENCE TO POPPLE'S MAP AND PENNSYLVANIA BOUNDARIES
(Franklin 1748): "The fall of Niagara, which Popple's map lays down in the N-West corner of this province
[*], is, according to Henepin, compounded of two great cross streams of water, and two falls, with an isle
sloping along between. The waters falls from a horrible precipice above 600 foot, and foam and boil in an
hideous manner, making an outrageous noise, more terrible than thunder; for when the wind blows out of
the South, their dismal roaring may be heard more than 15 Leagues off." [*] Actually, Popple's map shows
the north-west corner of Pennsylvania to be a few miles short of Niagara Falls but still on Lake Ontario.
Popple for political reasons moved this boundary farther west and closer to Fort Niagara on his engraved
map of 1733 than it is shown on his manuscript map of 1727. Patrick Gordon, Lieutenant Governor of
Pennsylvania, in his 1731 letter (Gordon 1731) to the Board of Trade and Plantations [see note 10],
complained about Delisle's 1718 map but nevertheless used it as an authority to try to expand Pennsylvania
farther to the west. Gordon wrote that the width of Pennsylvania being "five degrees of longitude", "by the
exactest French maps yet given us, particularly De L'Isle's, the North-west corner" of Pennsylvania "will
fall on their Lakes". In setting Pennsylvania's boundaries on his map Popple tried to conform with Delisle's
1718 map in that one respect (placing the western boundary of Pennsylvania on both Lake Erie and Lake
Ontario) - to avoid conflict with Gordon's interpretation. On the other hand, taking note that Gordon
complained in his letter that "The French in their said maps extend their Louisiana as far East as the River
Susquehannah", which is in Pennsylvania, Popple abruptly terminated Delisle's Ohio River south of Lake
Erie and far away from Gordon's province. This avoided placing the sources of the French-controlled Ohio
River farther east and supporting a French claim to parts of Pennsylvania. | |||||
| Note 3 | CHARLES CARROLL OF CARROLLTON'S COPY OF POPPLE'S MAP. Born September 20, 1737.
Member of the Maryland Convention (1774-1776) and of the Committee of Safety (1775-1777). One of the
Commissioners, together with Franklin and Chase, sent by Congress in 1774 to Canada in an unsuccessful
attempt to effect an alliance. Signer of the Declaration of Independence. Died November 14, 1832. Copy
C74 has Charles Carroll's bookplate. It was sold at an auction of his Library in Baltimore starting on
December 5, 1864. Carroll owned other important maps and atlases of North America. Gibson (1864)
provides the following descriptions: p. 64, No. 883½, "POPPLE'S Maps of America. Folio, half sheep"; p.
46, No. 698, "MELISH'S Map of the U.S. 8vo. morocco. [and] MELISH, (Jno) Geographical Description
of the U.S. & c. 12mo. half morocco. Phila. 1816"; p. 75, No. 1060, "TANNER'S Large Folio Atlas. half
sheep. Phila. 1826" [Tanner's "large folio" New American Atlas, editions dated 1823 and 1825; Ristow
(1985, 198) states, "Although the entire atlas as a whole was apparently revised only once, in 1825, some
editions of it have maps dated as late as 1839."] | |||||
| Note 4 | HENRY POPPLE APPOINTED CLERK to the Board of Trade and Plantations (Board of Trade Journals):
"Whitehall, Tuesday 18:th April 1727. At a Meeting of His Majesty's Commiss:ns for Trade & Plantations.
Present Earl of Westmoreland. M:r Pelham. M:r Docminique. M:r Ashe. M:r Plumner [sic]. […]
Miscellanies.M:r Henry Popple appointed a Clerk. Their Lordships taking into Consideration their
Minutes of the 7:th Novem:r 1721, when the Board resolv'd that M:r Henry Popple shou'd supply the first
Vacancy of a Clerk's Place that should happen in this Office; Their Lordships then appointed him to supply
the Vacancy occasion'd by M:r Hoskins having been dismiss'd the 11:th Instant. M:r Lanham appointed a
Clerk. The Secry acquainting the Board that M:r Will.m Gray, late a Clerk in this Office, is dead; M:r Ashe
recommended M:r Rich:d Lanham to supply the Vacancy occasion'd thereby, & he was appointed
accordingly; Whereupon order'd that the other Clerks shou'd be advanc'd according to their Seniority in the
Office, whereby the said Clerks will have the following Allowances, Viz: £ […] Henry Popple … 40." | |||||
| Note 5 | ANNOUNCEMENT OF HENRY POPPLE'S DEATH, 1743. The Gentleman's Magazine, Vol. 13, 1743,
p.553: "A LIST of DEATHS for the Year 1743. […] Sept. 27. AT Bordeaux, Henry Popple, Esq; formerly
Cashire to the late Q.[ueen] and Agent to several Regiments." See also: London Magazine, Vol. 12, 1743,
p.517. | |||||
| Note 6 | BRITISH EXPANSIONIST POLICY PROMOTED BY THE BOARD OF TRADE AND PLANTATIONS
(Calendar, for 1727, Item No. 837): The very year that the Board employed Henry Popple, the
Commissioners wrote a letter to the Duke of Newcastle complaining that in 1726 the French erected Fort
Niagara and in response the British "thought it necessary to erect another on the River Oswego". Despite
the French being there first the Board concluded that all of that territory belonged to Britain because "in
1726, the Indians Nations [sic], as a confirmation of their entire subjection to H.M., did surrender all their
lands to him, and upon part of these lands, both the forts in question are erected" [See note 10 about
undetermined boundaries and Indian lands in that area]. The Commissioners commended Governor Burnet
for acting "with prudence and integrity" in obtaining this "surrender" from the Indians ("supposed"
surrender according to Patrick Gordon in 1731). The Board asked the Duke "to take the first opportunity to
[…] make the proper instances for redressing of these grievances". Letter dated December 21, 1727, with
earlier "representation" dated January 11, 1727. | |||||
| Note 7 | Presenting John Huske's 1755 map A new and accurate map of North America (wherein the errors of all
preceeding British, French and Dutch maps, respecting the rights Great Britain, France & Spain, & the
limits of each of His Majesty's provinces, are corrected) (Sellers & Van Ee 1981, No. 67) as a good
example, Blakemore & Harley (1980, 92) write: "Cartographic images have often been deliberately
falsified for political ends." | |||||
| Note 8 | DODUN ON NEW MEXICO'S SILVER MINES, BRITISH INTENTIONS AND THREAT TO
LOUISIANA, (Dodun 1726): "The new colony of Louisiana granted by the King to the Company of the
Indies is of infinite importance to the state because of its situation and because of what it can produce.
Louisiana must be regarded as a barrier between the English colonies of North America and at the same
time be considered as a part of New Mexico [sic] in which are found the same mines and which at the same
time produces all sorts of food supplies, as much tobacco as will be wanted, indigo, tar and beaverskins. It
is easy to understand that this new establishment causes the Spaniards and the English great jealousy. The
English colonies contiguous to Louisiana are so powerful and populous that if the English found a way to
drive us out of them and put themselves in our place not only would they drive us out of Canada without
difficulty but it would not take them four years to get possession of New Mexico full of silver mines in
operation. What disorder would this restless nation our natural enemy not create in Europe if it had such
resources in money? . . . [This concern about the English gaining control of the Spanish silver mines in New
Mexico was apparently not only limited to Dodun. Giraud (1991, 402 n 50) lists later French
correspondence dealing with this issue, comprising letters by: Mathieu Marais of March 24 and April 28,
1730; Louisiana Governor Etienne Périer of August 14, 1728 and August 1, 1730; Bernard Diron
Dartaguiette (Commandant at Mobile) of April 6, 1726.]
In 1725 the English undertook two enterprises equally dangerous for our colony. One is a considerable
establishment on the Ohio River by means of which they can come down to the Mississippi in four days and
take themselves to the mouth of the Wabash River and put the Illinois behind them. […] The other
enterprise which they undertook was to send a number of traders and a quantity of merchandise to the
Choctaw and Chickasaw nations which are the center of our colony. We do not know at all what has
happened among the Chickasaws. Fortunately among the Choctaws a little chief always devoted to Mr. de
Bienville, formerly the governor, incited by a French interpreter whom he has been keeping there for twenty
years, tomahawked an Englishman and that has put the others to flight, but we may expect that they will
return and as soon as they are in control of these two nations they will have all the lower part of our colony
destroyed when they wish to do so. […] Although it is true that the King has granted the proprietorship of
the colony to the Company of the Indies his Majesty none the less retains the right to restore order in it
when the Company governs it badly enough for it to be on the verge of being lost and of passing under the
domination of the English." | |||||
| Note 9 | HENRY POPPLE'S 20-SHEET MAP COMPLETED IN DECEMBER 1733 (Board of Trade Journals):
"Whitehall, Tuesday Dec:r 18:th 1733. Plans Genl: Map finish'd. L:re to ye Treasury. At a Meeting of
His Majesty's Commiss:rs for Trade and Plantations. Present M:r Docminique M:r Bladen M:r Brudenell.
[…] The Secretary acquainting y:e Board that the Map of the British Empire in America (to which their
Lordships have already Subscribed) was now finished by his Brother and was ready to be delivered, And
their Lordships being of Opinion, that it might be of Service to send one of the Said Maps to each
Governm:t in America a letter to the Lords of the Treasury upon this Subject was Sign'd." | |||||
| Note 10 | PATRICK GORDON ON DELISLE'S 1718 MAP AND JOHN SENEX'S NEW GENERAL ATLAS OF
1721 (Gordon 1731): "The boundaries [of Pennsylvania] are nowhere fixed but on the East by the River
Delaware. On the North there has never yet been any occasion to fix the 43rd degree, which 'tis conceived
extends to the settlements of the Five Nations now supposed by the Government of New York to belong to
that Province. Nor have any attempts been made to measure off the five degrees of longitude (which is the
breadth of the Province by the King's patent, and would make about 265 miles) to the westward, but by the
exactest French maps yet given us, particularly De L'Isle's, the North-west corner by these degrees of
longitude and latitude will fall on their Lakes [see Note 2] . . . The French in their said maps extend their
Louisiana as far East as the River Susquehannah which runs into the head of Chesapeak, by which the
Eastern and Western shores (as they are commonly called) both of Maryland and Virginia are divided, and
therefore they leave to Pensylvania [sic] a breadth only of about 60 Eng. miles. It is also remarkable that the
Editors of a volume of Geography published in a very large folio anno 1721 by subscription from many of
the Nobility and great Officers of Britain as well as others called A New General Atlas, [Sabin 1885, No.
79124; Phillips 1909, No. 563] the maps in which are engraved or revised by Senex, have, to the scandal
of the Nation, unadvisedly inserted into it that Map of Louisiana ["A MAP OF LOUISIANA AND OF THE
RIVER MISSISSIPI [sic] By Iohn Senex" (Phillips 1901, 568); for a picture, see Map No. 12 in The French
Origin of the Americas - a catalog of An Exhibition of Maps & Charts October 24, 1977, Publication No. 7
of the Collection for the History of Cartography, California State University, Fullerton] as a proper
description of that country, without any alteration or restriction, by which, as far as the authority of that
book can contribute, they give up to the French all their exorbitant claims to the greater part of these British
Dominions, which whether it may deserve the notice of your Honourable Board is humbly submitted, but it
cannot but give those who have considered the mistake and have any concern for the honour and interest of
the Crown of Great Britain a very just resentment." | |||||
| Note 11 | REFERENCES TO POPPLE'S MAP in The Memorials of the English and French Commissaries, 1755.
Wallis (1985): "Map evidence became a major issue when Commissioners were set up by England and
France in 1749 to determine the problem of boundaries in Nova Scotia. By the 12th Article of the Treaty of
Utrecht, 1713, 'Nova Scotia, or Acadia, with its ancient limits', had been assigned to England, and by the
13th Article, Newfoundland was confirmed to England. The boundary of Nova Scotia, however, was
undefined, and even the names of the territory, Nova Scotia (as it was called by the British) and Acadia (as
named by the French) were a matter of dispute. In the ensuing debate the well-known maps of the previous
fifty years were consulted and cited, but with a curious reversal of national claims. It was politically
expedient for the French to assert the merits of English maps, and the English to counter with the merits of
the French maps. Thus the French commissioners commended three British maps, Edmund Halley's world
chart showing magnetic declination, 1702, Popple's map of North America, 1733, and Thomas Salmon's
map of the English colonies in his System of History and Geography, vol. III, (p.425). The British
commissioners found fault with all three maps as evidence. They advanced instead the merits of Guillaume
Delisle's Carte de l'Amerique septentrionale, 1700 [Tooley 1985, Nos. 28-34], and Carte de [du] Canada,
1703 [Kershaw 1993-97, Nos. 308-16], both of which extended the area of Nova Scotia; together with Jean
Baptiste Bourguignon d'Anville's map of Amerique septentrionale, 1746, [Lowery & Phillips 1912, 290-91] and Jacques Nicolas Bellin's chart of 1744 [Carte de la Partie Orientale de la Nouvelle France ou du
Canada; Kershaw 1993-97, Nos. 864-85]".
Mémoire des Commissaires Francois, du 4 Octobre 1751. En Résponse aux Mémoires des Commissaires
de sa Majesté Britannique, Des 21 Septembre 1750 & 11 Janvier 1751. p. 185: "Vers 1738 [sic], le sieur
Popple publia une carte de toute l'Amerique septentrionale: il paroît que cet auteur a consulté les chartes &
les anciens titres; il a marqué mieux que la plûpart des autres Géographes les limites des concessions
accordées par les Rois d'Angleterre, soit qu'elles se concilient ou non avec les droits & les possessions des
Autres Nations: il a entrepris sa carte avec l'approbation des Commissaires du bureau du commerce & des
plantations, & il paroît qu'ils lui ont fait communiquer les arpentages qui leur avoient été transmis par les
Gouverneurs des colonies Angloises; enfin cette carte est dédiée à la seue Reine d'Angleterre, qui accordoit
une protection particulière aux arts & aux sciences. Dans cette carte, qui donne à la nouvelle E'cosse
idéale, à peu près les limites désignées par la charte de Jacques Ier. de 1621, on restreint l'Acadie, & avec
raison, aux seules côtes du sud-est de la péninsule. Les Mines & Chignitou sont marqués bien sensiblement
n'en point faire partie, & être une dépendance de l'ancienne prétendue nouvelle E'cosse, & par conséquent
de la nouvelle France, puisque cette prétendue nouvelle E'cosse n'étoit elle même qu'une partie de la
nouvelle France. Le sieur Popple ayant travaillé sur les titres, comme la charte de la nouvelle E'cosse n'en
porte point les limites jusqu'à celles de la nouvelle Angleterre, il s'est trouvé dans l'entre-deux une étendue
de terrein assez considérable, auquel on ne pouvoit naturellement donner d'autre nom que celui de nouvelle
France, dont il fait évidemment partie; mais comme cette dénomination pouvoit être contraire à d'autres
vûes & à d'autres prétentions, il n'a pû trouver de meilleur expédient que de ne lui donner aucun nom.
Enfin, un particulier Anglois, nommé le sieur Salmon, a publié en 1739, en trois volumes in 4o. une histoire
moderne qu'il prétend renfermer le système le plus complet & le plus exact d'histoire & de Géographie.
Cette histoire est accompagnée de cartes, où le Géographe s'est conformé aux notions géographiques de
l'auteur: dans celle des colonies Angloises, inférée à la page 425 du tome III, la nouvelle E'cosse comprend
une partie de la péninsule, & l'Acadie propre n'en occupe que la côte du sud-est. Ce même auteur, en
faifant la description de la nouvelle E'cosse, s'enonce de la forte, tome III, page 425. La nouvelle E'cosse,
dans laquelle je comprends l'Acadie, &c. ce qui suppose que l'Acadie n'en est qu'une partie." | |||||
| Reply of the English Commissaries, Paris, 23 January 1753. MEMORIAL presented by his Majesty's
Commissaries to the Commissaries of his Most Christian Majesty, in Reply to their Memorial of the 4th of
October 1751, concerning Nova Scotia or Acadia. p. 275 - 281: "The three English Maps cited by the
French Commissaries are, one by Mr. Halley, another by Mr. Popple, and a third by Mr. Salmon; and to
give them the greater Weight, they are very careful to do Justice to the great Knowledge of Mr. Halley in
Geography and Astronomy, and they observe that Mr. Popple is one of those who have 'travaille sur les
titres.' […] As to Mr Popple's Map, the French Commissaries have no other Authority from any
Circumstances attending the Publication of that Map, for supposing that it was made under the Inspection or
Patronage of the Board of Trade, or for representing Mr. Popple as a Person whose Situation should give
additional Credit to it; than that Mr. Popple has said in the Margin of his Map, that he undertook that Work
with the Approbation of the Lords Commissioners of Trade and Plantations, who might very well approve
of such an Undertaking but who never superintended or approved of Mr. Popple's Manner of executing it.
Mr. Popple inserted this marginal Note meerly to secure a better Reception to his Work; he does not pretend
in it, that the then Board of Trade had ever approved of any thing farther than the Undertaking, his Map was
framed according to his own particular Notions; he published it upon his own single Authority; the Board of
Trade at the Time gave it no extraordinary Sanction. It is inconsistent with the very Records it pretends to
have copied; it came into the World as the Performance of a single Person; it has ever been thought in Great
Britain to be a very incorrect Map, and has never in any Negociation between the two Crowns been
appealed to by Great Britain, as being correct, or a Map of any Authority. But if the French Commissaries
could make this Map to have been the Work of a Servant of the English Government directed at the time by
the Board of Trade, what Evidence could they draw from it, of any Effect in the present Discussion? Mr.
Popple has marked the Peninsula with the Name of Acadia, and the whole Country westward as far as the
Southern Bank of the River St. Laurence with the Name of Nova Scotia, of which he makes St. Croix the
western Boundary, which shews he thought the Country of Acadia or Nova Scotia extended from the
southern Bank of the River St. Laurence to St. Croix, and makes his Map but a very slight Authority for the
French Commissaries, who continue Acadia or Nova Scotia to the south-eastern Part of the Peninsula, or
for the Opinion of the Sieur Durand, who confines it to the whole of the Peninsula only.
As to Mr. Salmon, the English Commissaries little expected ever to have heard his Authority cited in a
national Discussion. The Author himself is a very obscure Man, in great Distress, who writes entirely for
Bread, his Opportunities of Knowledge are very small, and his Knowledge is in Proportion to them, and the
French Commissaries could not possibly have found any other Work upon any Subject in the whole English
Language of so little Authority, and so little Credibility in all Lights as this History of Mr. Salmon's which
they have cited; it would be endless to transcribe Instances of the Ignorance of this Author, upon whose
Authority, should it ever be admitted in Discussions of this Nature, almost every Error in Fact, or in
Geography, may be supported upon some Part of his Writings: We persuade ourselves that the French
Commissaries would not have appealed to his Writings, as to any Authority, if they have been better
informed of the Character and Situation of the Writer, and the universal Contempt shown to his Writings in
his own Country, or if they had considered how little Credibility is due to his Testimony if his whole
Account of America be taken together." | ||||||
| Note 12 | JOHN GREEN'S COMMENTS ON POPPLE'S MAP, 1755 ([Green] 1755, 14): "The first tolerable
Draught to be met with of Nova Scotia is that which Mr. Popple has given us in his 12 [sic] Sheet Map of
the British Empire in America, published in 1733. This Gentleman, as Secretary to the Board of Trade [sic],
was in Possession of many choice Materials found in the Plantation-office; and yet his Map has been the
Subject of Criticism ever since Publication. But how should it happen otherwise ? Since it does not at all
appear, that he (or rather Capt. Lampriere his Operator) made Use of Any Astronomical Observations:
Without which no Accuracy as to the Situation of Places, (which is the principal Object of Geography)
could be expected, however some Places might fortuitously fall right as to either latitude or longitude, like
the Capes Kanso and Sable before mentioned [Note 48]". | |||||
| Note 13 | HENRY POPPLE'S ADVERTISEMENT in THE DAILY POST of London, April 6, 1731. Supplied by
Donald Hodson:
"This Day is publish'd PROPOSALS By Mr. HENRY POPPLE, For PRINTING by SUBSCRIPTION, A MAP OF NORTH-AMERICA, eight Foot six Inches long, and Eight Foot broad, from five to fifty-five Degrees of Latitude laid down according to Mercator's Projection; to be engraved by the best Masters, and printed upon the best Paper. Wherein are particularly describ'd all the known Rivers, Lakes, Mountains, Sand-Banks, &c. As also all the English, French, Dutch, Spanish, and other European Settlements, whether upon the Continent, or on the Islands, the exact Boundaries of the several English Colonies, as limited by their respective Charters, or settled by actual Surveys; and the Routs observed by the Indian Traders, English and French on the Continent, with the Passages discovered by the French from Quebec for a Communication with their Settlements about the Emboucheur of the River Mississipi, To which are added, several particular Draughts of the most noted Harbours, and some Prospects of the Principal Towns, and an exact Prospect of that very remarkable Fall of Niagara. Mr. POPPLE undertook this Map with the Approbation of the Right Hon. the Lords Commissioners of Trade and Plantations; and great Care has been taken by comparing all the Maps, Charts, and Observations that could be found, especially the authentick Records and actual Surveys transmitted to their Lordships, by the Governors of the British Plantations, and others, to correct the many Errors committed in former Maps. This Map having been shewn to the Learned Dr. Edmund Halley, Professor of Astronomy in the University of Oxford, and F.R.S. he was pleased to give his Opinion of it in the Words following:I have seen the abovementioned Map, which, as far as I am Judge, seems to have been laid down with great Accuracy, and to shew the Position of the different Provinces and Islands in that Part of the Globe, more truly than any yet extant. EDMUND HALLEY. The price to Subscribers is four Guineas, two down, and the other two on the Delivery of the Map (in the
Manner promised by the Proposals) at Lady-day [March 25th - the first day of a year according to the
English calendar] 1732, at the farthest; and since the Proposer has been obliged to defer it so long, on
account of some further Helps he has obtained, and which have occasion'd Corrections in it, he thinks
himself obliged to acquaint those Gentlemen who have already favour'd him with their Subscriptions, that
he hopes they will excuse the Delay; but if not, he will, on sending their Receipts, return the Money
received. PROPOSALS are deliver'd, and SUBSCRIPTIONS taken in, by Mr. Tonsson and Mr. Prevost in
the Strand, Mr. Stagg in Westminster Hall, Mr. Brindley in New Bond-street, and Mr. Clark under the
Royal Exchange." | |||||
| Note 14 | HIGH COST OF POPPLE'S MAP. The price of 4 Guineas that Popple demanded for his map in the period
between 1733 and 1739 may have been so prohibitive as to impact sales of States 1-6 of the map. The cost
was high compared not only to the cost of maps and atlases published earlier, like the 1728 Atlas Maritimus
& Commercialis, but also published many years later. In one sales catalogue, Osborne & Shipton (1754),
Item No. 2240-41 offered for sale copies of Bowen's 2-volume 1747 Atlas [note 55], with 70 maps and
1,817 text pages, for less than 4 Guineas: "Compleat System of Geography, with 70 Maps by Bowen, 2 vol.
half bound, 1747, 3l 3s"; and, "The same, 2 vol. neatly bound, 1747, 3l 10s". John Mitchell advertised in
the March 28, 1755 issue of The Public Advertiser: "This Day is Published […] Map of the British and
French Dominions in North America […]" (Stevens & Tree 1967, No. 54(a) or 54(b), "First Edition") and
offered the map at only 1 Guinea on "Imperial paper" and 1½ Guinea on "superfine double elephant paper
and neatly coloured" (I owe this reference to Donald Hodson). Later, in the midst of the American
Revolution, when demand must have been the highest, Faden (1778, 9) offered "A Map of the British
Colonies in North America, with the Roads, Distances, Limits and Extents of the Settlements, on eight
Sheets, 1775, --- Mitchell" (Stevens & Tree 1967, No. 54(f), "Fifth Edition"), still only for 1 Guinea. | |||||
| Note 15 | HENRY POPPLE'S ADVERTISEMENT in THE LONDON EVENING-POST, March 27-29, 1739.
Basically the same ad. appeared in THE LONDON DAILY POST, AND GENERAL ADVERTISER of
February 28, 1739. Supplied by Donald Hodson.
"This Day is publish'd, Price Four Guineas, A Map of the British Empire in America, with the French and Spanish Settlements adjacent thereto: Wherein the exact Boundaries of the several British Colonies and Governments are delineated from their respective Charts. By HENRY POPPLE, Esq, F.R.S. This Map was undertaken with the Approbation of the Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners for Trade and Plantations, and great Care as well as Time has been employ'd in comparing all the Maps, Charts, and Observations that could be found, especially the authentick Records and actual Surveys transmitted to their Lordships by the Governors of the British Plantations, and others, to correct the many Errors committed in former Maps. The original Drawing of this Map having been shewn to the learned Dr. Ed. Halley, Professor of Astronomy in the University of Oxford, and F.R.S. he was pleas'd to give his Opinion of it in the Words following: I have seen the abovemention'd Map, which as far as I am Judge, seems to have been laid down with great Accuracy, and to shew the Position of the different Provinces and Islands in that Part of the Globe, more truly than any yet extant. ED. HALLEY. This Map is above eight Feet Square, is pasted upon Cloth, with neat Rollers, and distinctly colour'd: Those
that chuse, may have Prints from the several Plates bound up in Pasteboards in the Nature of an Atlas, with
which is also bound the same Map, reduced to so small a Scale, as to be contain'd in one Sheet; which may
be had separate. Price 2 s. Sold by W.H. Toms, Engraver, in Union-Court, near Hat-on-Garden, Holbourn;
G. Foster, Print-seller, and Mess Innys and Manby, in St. Paul's Church-Yard; J. King in the Poultry; E.
Cummins, at the Royal-Exchange; J. Senex and P. Overton in Fleet-street; P. Fourdrinier, R. Amy, and S.
Winbush, at Charing-Cross; J. Stagg and R. Hulton, in Westminfter-Hall; R. Amey in the Court of
Requests; R. Dodsley, in Pall-Mall; J. Jolliffe, in St. James's-street; J. Brindley, and W. Shropshire, in
Bond-street." | |||||
| Note 16 | TOMS'S AND HARDING'S ADVERTISEMENTS OF POPPLE'S MAP 1739-40. I owe these references
to Donald Hodson.
THE GENERAL EVENING POST, August 9-11, 1739. "On Monday next will be publish'd, MR. HENRY POPPLE's large MAP (full eight Feet square) of the British Empire in North America, with the French, Spanish, and Dutch Settlements, adjacent thereto; Which while in Mr. Popple's Possession was never sold under Four Guineas; Is now offered to the Publick for One Guinea and Half in Sheets, by S. Harding, Bookseller, on the Pavement in St. Martin's-lane; W. H. Toms, Engraver, in Union-Court, near Hatton Garden, in Holborn; and S. Birt, Bookseller, in Ave-mary-lane, near Ludgate-street. This curious Map was undertaken with the Approbation of the Right Honourable the Lord's [sic] Commissioners for Trade and Plantations, and is allow'd by all Judges to be executed in a most exact and grand Manner, the Author having spared no Expence to make it the completest [sic] Map of it's Kind. The learned Dr. Edmund Halley was pleased to give his Opinion of it in the Words following: I have seen the above-mentioned Map, which, as far as I am Judge, seems to have been laid down with great Accuracy, and to shew the Position of the different Provinces and Islands in that Part of the Globe, more truly than any yet extant. ED. HALLEY. N.B. This Map has not yet been exported, and but few printed off, by reason of its former large Price. But for a greater Encouragement to Merchants, or others, going on trading to Foreign Parts, shall (besides the considerable Abatement already proposed) have a further Allowance made them upon purchasing a Number together. At present may be had some which are pasted on Cloth and Rollers to them, and also a few bound up in Books, in the Nature of an Atlas." THE LONDON EVENING-POST, August 16-18, 1739. Copy is too poor to be fully transcribed. "This Day is publish'd MR. HENRY POPPLE's large MAP" is confirmed in the advertisement. The ad lists only S. Harding, W. H. Toms and S. Birt as sellers of the map. THE LONDON EVENING-POST, December 8-11, 1739. "Just publish'd, MR. HENRY POPPLE's large
MAP of the British Empire in America; with the French, Spanish and Dutch Settlements, adjacent thereto;
which very distinctly shews all the Places where the Seat of Action in the West-Indies is likely to be in the
present War with Spain. (Compris'd in fifteen whole Sheets, and five half Sheets of Imperial size Paper,
with the particular Contents of each Sheet printed) Which Map was never sold under Four Guineas by Mr.
Popple, but now is offer'd to the Publick at the following Prices, with the small Map, (design'd by Mr.
Popple as an Index) which is given gratis on buying either of the following Sorts. | |||||
| £ | s | d | ||||
| In the Sheets, | 1 | 11 | 6 | |||
| Bound in the Nature of an Atlas, | 1 | 16 | 6 | |||
| Pasted on a
Cloth, with
Rolls, and
colour'd, |
2 | 12 | 6 | |||
| By S. Harding on the Pavement in St. Martin's Lane; W. H. Toms in Union-Court near Hatton-Garden,
Holbourn; S. Birt in Ave-mary-lane; J. Bowles at the Black Horse in Cornhill and J. Jackson in St. James's
street. N.B. Mr. Popple undertook this Map with the Approbation of the Right Honourable the Lords
Commissioners of Trade and Plantations, and great Care was taken to compare all the Maps; Charts, &c.
especially the authentick Records and actual Surveys, transmitted to their Lordships by the Governors of the
British Plantations, and others. The learned Dr. Edmund Halley's Opinion of the Map is, That it is laid
down with great Accuracy and shews the Position of the different Provinces and Islands in that Part of the
Globe more truly than any yet extant."
THE GENERAL EVENING POST, July 10-12, 1740. This advertisement is basically the same as the
advertisement in THE LONDON EVENING-POST of December 8-11, 1739 provided above. | ||||||
| Note 17 | TOMS'S & HARDING'S ADVERTISEMENT OF POPPLE'S MAP. THE DAILY ADVERTISER,
February 2, 1745. Supplied by Donald Hodson.
"MR. POPPLE's Map of AMERICA printed on twenty Sheets of Imperial Paper, [done from the] latest, and most correct Draughts and Surveys. The CONTENTS of this MAP are as ["below" or "follows"]: [This part of copy too poor to be transcribed. However, it appears to be an exact copy of the text of the marketing advertisement leaf shown here in Fig. 20 - starting with 'It is laid down from the 5th to the 55th Degree ….' and ending with '…. or who would attain any tolerable Idea, of the European Acquisitions in North-America.' ] Formerly sold by Mr. Popple for Four Guineas, and now sold by S. Harding, on the Pavement in St. Martin's Lane; and W.H. Toms, in Union-Court, near Hatton-Garden, Holborn, for One Guinea and Half in Sheets and Two Guineas bound and colour'd." THE LAST OF TOMS & HARDING'S ADVERTISEMENTS OF POPPLE'S MAP. THE GENERAL EVENING POST. (LONDON.), July 23-25, 1745. Supplied by Donald Hodson. The same advertisement appeared in THE DAILY ADVERTISER on July 25, 1745; July 26, 1745; and July 27, 1745. "Mr. Popple's MAP of North-America, Either in Large or Small, May be had at S. Harding's, on the
Pavement in St. Martin's Lane or of W. H. Toms, Engraver in Union Court, near Hatton-Garden, Holborn;
DONE from the latest and most correct Draughts and Surveys, transmitted to the Right Hon. the Lords
Commissioners for Trade and Plantations. It is laid down from the 5th to the 55th Degree of North-Latitude,
and therein comprehends the several British Plantations and Colonies. The Settlements of the French along
the extensive Lakes and Rivers of St. Lawrence in Canada, and the Missisippi. The Coasts and Colonies
settled or claimed by the Spaniards. Also the Dutch Colony of Surinam. All which shews its Usefulness to
the Four great Trading Nations of Europe, and all others concerned in Commerce with, or who would attain
any tolerable Idea, of the European Acquisitions in North-America. N.B. Both the large Map and the small,
at a very great Expence, were most accurately and neatly engraved." | |||||
| Note 18 | JOHN BOYDELL'S 1754 ADVERTISEMENT OF POPPLE'S MAP. THE LONDON EVENING-POST,
May 28-30, 1754. Supplied by Donald Hodson.
"This Day was publish'd, POPPLE'S MAP of the British Empire in America, with the French and Spanish
Settlements adjacent thereto. This Map is contain'd in twenty-one Plates, on fine Imperial Paper, and now
sold in Sheets, at 1 £. 1 s. bound 1 £. 6 s. colour'd on Rollers, at 2 £. 2s. N.B. It was originally sold for four
Guineas. Sold by J. Boydell, Engraver, at the Unicorn, the Corner of Queen street in Cheapside, where may
be had the best Ground for Etching." | |||||
| Note 19 | COVENS'S & MORTIER'S ADVERTISEMENTS OF POPPLE'S MAP 1742-60 (Krogt 1985): 9
advertisements from the Dutch paper Amsterdamsche Courant: (1) February 6, 1742: " t'Amsterdam by
Covens en Mortier […] en in weynig dagen zal men kunnen bekomen het schoone Werk van America, door
den Heer Pople, voor f 4, en afgezet f 5. gem. Kaerten (als mede de Atlas van de l'Isle) zyn te bekomen by
Mr. Overton te Londen." (2) December 1, 1742: " t'Amsterd. by Covens en Mortier […] America door
Pople in 7 bl." (3) July 6, 9 & 12, 1743: "t'Amsterdam by Covens en Mortier, werden uytgegeven de
Theaters van Oorlog […] in America in 7 bl." (4) July 11 & 18, 1744: "t'Amst. by Covens en Mortier […]
De weergalooze fraye Kaert van Noord America door Popple, in 7 bladen." (5) June 1, 1748: "t'Amst. by
Covens en Mortier, op de Vygendam, en by S. [J. ?] Covens de Jonge, op de hoek van de Waermoestraet en
Vygendam […] De Engelsche, Fransche en Hollandsche Colonien in America door Pople, 7 blaeden." (6)
August 2 & 7, 1755: " t'Amsterdam by COVENS EN MORTIER op de Vygendam, is nieuw gemaekt een
Kaart von Noord America, de Golf van Mexico en een gedeelte van Zuyd America, Surinamen ingesloten,
uytvoerig in groot bestek op 7 Blaeden; aenwysende de bezittingen der Engelschen, Franschen, Spaanschen
en Hollandschen, door Pople, de prys is f 5-10 afgezet." (7) September 27, 1755: "By COVENS en
MORTIER op de Vygendam te Amsterdam, is gemaekt en zal in weynig daegen te bekomen zyn de
beroemde Kaert door DOCTOR MITCHELL van Noord America in 8 groote blaeden, aenvyzende de
bezittingen der Engelschen en Franschen derzelver Colonien, Graefschappen, Steeden, Sterktens, Weegen,
Distantien &c., op het allernaukeurigste. By dezelve is te bekomen Noord America, de Golf van Mexico en
een gedeelte van Zuyd America, Surinamen ingeslooten in 7 blaeden door POPPLE." (8) November 6,
1755: "By COVENS en MORTIER op de Vygendam t'Amst., is gemaekt en te bekomen de beroemde
Kaert door DOCTOR MITCHELL van Noord America, in 8 groote Bladen; aenwyzende de Bezittingen der
Engelschen en Franschen, de zelver Colonien, Graefschappen, Steeden, Sterktens, Weegen, Distantien &c.
Nog daer by gevoegt de Plans en Fortressen van Quebec, Louisburg en Halifax, op het allernaeuwkeurigst;
de prys is f 8. afgezet. By dezelve is nog te bekomen Noord America, de Golf van Mexico, en een gedeelte
van Zuyd America, Surinamen ingeslooten, in 7 Bladen, door POPPLE; de prys is 5-10, afgezet." (9) July
5, 1760: "t'Amsterdam by Covens en Mortier, op de Vygendam […] De beroemde Kaart van Noord
America, op 8 bladen, door Dr. Mitchel. De Kaart van Noord-America met de Golf van Mexico, Surinamen
ingeslooten, op 7 bladen, door Pople." | |||||
| Note 20 | STEEL, David. (Plomer 1932): bookseller and publisher in London, (1) Bible and Crown, King Street,
Little Tower Hill, 1765; (2) 1 Union Row, the lower end of the Minories, Little Tower Hill, 1765-84.
Publisher of nautical books like Steel's Original and Correct list of the Royal Navy, 1783, or of American
interest Steel's Naval Remembrancer, 1784. His name is also found in the second edition of Bougainville's
History of a Voyage to the Malouine (or Falkland) Islands, published in 1773. [M.B.]: David Steel
published in 1765, in 2 volumes, John Wright's A compleat history of the late war describing the events of
the French and Indian War. In 1790 David Steel published the 3rd edition of The Ship-Master's Assistant
and Owner's Manual: […] London: Printed for D. Steel, at the Navigation-Warehouse, No. 1, Union-Row,
Little Tower-Hill. M.DCC.XC. [NYPL]. At end of this 1790 publication there is a list of David Steel's 31
"Charts from the latest and best Surveys", with prices. Among the 31 charts, 10 are of American interest.
Abbreviated titles of these 10 large charts (probably published c. 1785), grouped under the heading
"America and West-Indies", are provided: (1) NEWFOUNDLAND, with its BANKS, on 4 large Sheets
£1.1s; (2) The GULPH and RIVER of St. LAWRENCE, on 2 large Sheets 7s 6d; (3) CAPE BRETON and
NOVA SCOTIA to the BAY OF FUNDY, on 2 large Sheets 7s 6d; (4) From the BAY OF FUNDY to NEW
YORK, on 2 large Sheets 7s 6d; (5) From NEW YORK to NORTH CAROLINA, on 2 large Sheets 7s 6d; (6)
From NORTH CAROLINA to EAST FLORIDA, on 2 large Sheets 7s 6d [Full title of this map - "A Chart
of North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and East Florida". Imprint - "Published as the Act directs by
David Steel, Union Row, Tower Hill, July 15, 1785". 745 mm x 1295 mm. Inset maps of the harbors of
Charles Town, Port Royal and St. Augustine. Sotheby's, London, auction of October 24 & 25, 1996, Lot
210. Picture in catalog]; (7) From EAST FLORIDA to the MISSISSIPPI, on 2 large Sheets 7s 6d; (8) The
BAHAMA ISLANDS, on 2 large Sheets 7s 6d; (9) A GENERAL CHART of the WEST-INDIES, 6s. - And the
Islands separately; (10) The ATLANTIC OCEAN 10s 6d. | |||||
| Note 21 | ANALYSIS OF STATE 1 OF THE 20-SHEET MAP.
The NEWBERRY LIBRARY description of the only copy of State 1 located [census no.C1]. Cat. No. Ayer * 133 P83 1733, re-cataloged: TEMP * AYER map 7C G3300 1733 .P6. The reference to "state 1" in this description is to the classification by Cumming & Wallis (1972). "Index map, state 1. Large map, apparently state 1, except that the last part of the imprint "& R.W. Seale, 1733" has been erased from the page. The thinness and abrasion to the paper show that the erasure was made to the paper and not to the plate, and the length of the erasure suggests that Seale's name was also removed, and not just the date, which appears on prints taken from state 2 of the plate. The sheets are tipped to guards and sewn together. Only the spine of the original binding remains, both boards being missing. The front fly leaf, to which the index map is attached, is detached from the book block. Condition rather fragile, the bottom edges of some of the first sheets chipping with very slight loss of map surface. Attractive coloring, doubtless contemporary, the verdigris from the green wash having damaged and weakened the paper in places [typical of early coloring. Copy C4 at the New York Public Library (State 2b) appears to be damaged in the same way - M.B.]. Some cracks and tears, easily mended. George Bancroft's bookplate laid in. In a Newberry Library drop-spine box." HENRY STEVENS' description of State 1a? (Stevens 1948, Item No. 173): "RARE EARLY ISSUE OF POPPLE'S MAP. [Item] 173 POPPLE (Henry). A Map of the British Empire in North America [sic], with the French and Spanish Settlements adjacent thereto. London, Engrav'd by Willm. Henry Toms, (1732?). Engraved on 20 sheets, with Key Map and Contents Leaf. Half morocco. Fine copy. Folio $250.00*** First Edition, and apparently the earliest impression, without the name of a bookseller on the title map, and with "London, Engrav'd by Willm Henry Toms" on the last sheet, with the date 1733 inserted in ink by an early hand. This is obviously earlier than any of the three impressions described by Lowery [Lowery & Phillips 1912, 265-67] as being in the Library of Congress. Sabin, 64140, describes the John Carter Brown copy, which has a slightly different title and bears the publisher's name. This is rightly considered the finest map of North America produced up to the date. The 20 sheets when joined together form a map about 7 ft. 6 ins. square. It covers the whole of North America from Labrador in the North (Including the West Indies) to the Northern part of South America, and from the Atlantic Sea-board, to New Mexico in the West. In the top left-hand corner are Views of "Niagara" and "Mexico City" and in the top right hand corner are "Quebec" and "New York," each measuring 10½ by 5 ins., with lettered references. There are also numerous inset charts of the principal ports and harbours. A Fine large scale Map, 45 miles to the inch, decorated with ships, views and insets." M.B.: I speculate that State 1a of Popple's 20-sheet map, suggested by Henry Stevens' 1948 catalogue description provided above, has the Sheet 20 imprint "London Engrav'd by Will.m Henry Toms", with no copy yet located. I speculate that the Newberry Library copy [census C1] of Popple's map is an example of State 1 (later than State 1a) which had the imprint of "London Engrav'd by Will.m Henry Toms & R.W. Seale" - before the erasure of the text "& R.W. Seale" on that copy. Both State 1a and State 1 would not have the engraved date of "1733". A part of the imprint on Sheet 20 of this Newberry copy [census C1] has been erased. The remaining part of the engraved imprint contains only Toms' name and no engraved date (the date "1733" on the copy is in modern pencil). I believe that before erasure the imprint contained additional text "& R.W. Seale" only. The Newberry description declares that "the length of the erasure suggests that Seale's name was also removed, and not just the date". I think that this description is just an unfortunate attempt to conform to the Cumming & Wallis (1972) classification. I believe that the erasure is not long enough to have removed the whole text "& R.W. Seale, 1733." A careful inspection shows that the erasure goes only 12mm to the right of the outermost vertical thin neatline of the map's printed border. This would suffice to erase the text "& R.W. Seale" which should extend 11 mm to the right of that vertical neatline. But the erasure would have to extend 20 mm to the right of the outermost vertical neatline to erase the text "& R.W. Seale, 1733." The text "& R.W. Seale" was added later to the imprint on Popple's map. This text runs at a slightly
different angle than the preceding text "London Engrav'd by Will.m Henry Toms" and the letter "W" in "
R.W. " is engraved quite differently than "W" in " Will.m ". While the imprint ending on "Toms" would fit
entirely under the map border, the imprint with Seale's name sticks out to the right into the empty margin -
giving the appearance of a later addition. I am certain that the whole imprint would have been engraved to
position both of the names neatly under the border - if the very first issue of the map started with both
names. This suggests the existence of my hypothetical State 1a. In State 2, the "1733" date was added to
stake out Popple's claim for early publication. | |||||
| Note 22 | OGLETHORPE AND THE KING DISCUSS MAPS OF GEORGIA ON JULY 20, 1734. (1) THE
LONDON EVENING POST. "Numb. 1041 From SATURDAY, July 20, to TUESDAY, July 23, 1734.", p.2
- "Last Saturday […] James Oglethorpe, Esq; Member of Parliament for Haslemere in Surrey, waited on his
Majesty with several Charts and Curious Drawings relating to the new Settlement of Georgia, with which
his Majesty seem'd highly pleased." (2) THE GRUB-STREET JOURNAL. "NUMB. 239. THURSDAY,
JULY 25, 1734.", p.2 - "On Saturday James Oglethorpe, Esq; waited on his majesty with several charts and
curious drawings relating to the new settlement of Georgia, with which his majesty seem'd highly pleased.
DP." (3) THE LONDON JOURNAL. "NUMB. 787. SATURDAY, July 27, 1734.", p.2 - "Last Saturday
James Oglethorpe Esq; Member of Parliament for Haslemere in Surrey, waited on his Majesty with several
Charts and curious Drawings relating to the new Settlement of Georgia, with which his Majesty seemed
highly pleased." | |||||
| Note 23 | OGLETHORPE WRITES ABOUT ROAD THAT APPEARS IN STATE 4 OF POPPLE'S 20-SHEET
MAP (Oglethorpe 1732-35, 40): Letter from Oglethorpe in Savannah to the Trustees of the Georgia Colony,
about December, 1733 -- "Finding our People increase fast I enlarged our Quarters by new Settlements and
covered this place to the Southward by building Fort Argyle at about 20 miles distance [from Savannah
Town]. […] by Land from that Fort we marked a Road about 40 miles in length to Pallackucola Garrison in
Carolina [eastern side of Savannah River], in marking of which we found a River at about 12 miles from
this place to which we gave the Name of Abercorn." | |||||
| Note 24 | IMPORTANCE OF LOGWOOD TRADE AT TIME OF POPPLE'S MAP (Board of Trade Journals): The
entire meeting of the Commissioners for Trade & Plantations on February 7, 1733 dealt with a January 17,
1733 letter from the Duke of Newcastle. With his letter to the Board the Duke enclosed a number of papers
exchanged between the English and Spanish Commissaries who in late 1732 were conducting discussions in
Seville regarding commerce in America. These papers included a "Translation of the Spanish
Commissaries Reply relating to the Right of cutting Logwood" [see Calendar for 1733, Item No. 20]. The
matter of cutting Logwood was discussed again by the Commissioners for Trade & Plantations on February
8 and 9, 1733. At the February 15, 1733 Board meeting a "Letter from Mr. Harris […] relating to the
British Right of cutting Logwood at the Bay of Campeachy was read […] as also a Representation made
by the Board upon this Subject the 25th of September 1717" [Calendar for 1717, Item No. 104]. On
March 12, 1733 the "Board taking again into Consideration the Letter from the Duke of Newcastle with the
Translation of the Spanish Commissaries Reply relating to the Right of cutting Logwood at the Bay of
Campeachy, read the 7th of the last Month, as likewise the Representation of this Board of the 25th of
September 1717, upon this Subject & the Papers therein referr'd to, gave Directions for preparing the Draft
of a Letter to the Duke of Newcastle in answer to his abovementioned." At the March 21, 1733 Board
meeting the "Letter to the Duke of Newcastle, order'd to be prepar'd the 12th Instant relating to the Right of
cutting Logwood at the Bay of Campeachy, was agreed & sign'd." [Calendar]: Board's March 21, 1733
letter to the Duke of Newcastle. "We have considered the several copies and extracts of letters from H.M.
Commissaries at Seville, with a state of their proceedings about the right of H.M. subjects to cut logwood in
the Bay of Campeachy […] we find the British Commissarys have made use of several arguments drawn
from our said representation [of September 25, 1717], in maintenance of our right to cut logwood in the
Bay of Campeachy, and we have nothing further to add to those arguments which have been very properly
urged by the British Commissarys; but […] we take leave to acquaint your Grace, that upon re-examining
the several papers and old records in our office, we find […] that the English did cut logwood at
Campeachy before the year 1670, and had actually built houses on several parts of the Province of Yucatan,
where the Spaniards had no settlements. […] Thus the British subjects having been in possession of this
trade and of part of the lands of the Province of Yucatan, previous to the year 1670, […] if in the
prosecution of a trade which the English have so many years been intituled [sic] to, they should at certain
times have been interrupted by the Spaniards; we think such interruptions, far from invaliding our right, are
subjects of complaint on our side".
WILLIAM DOUGLASS IN 1747 ON LOGWOOD TRADE BEING THE BUSINESS OF NEW ENGLAND (Douglass 1747, 87-89): "The cutting and carrying of logwood, formerly from the Bay of Campeche, and laterly [sic] from the Bay of Honduras, in the Gulph of Mexico to Great-Britain and sundry European Markets; has been for some Time a Branch of the British America Trade, but more especially of New-England. This Logwood Business has been carried on for about eighty Years, ever since Anno 1667, by a Sort of Indulgence; this Indulgence was confirmed Anno 1670 by the American Treaty with Spain, viz. The English to remain in the Occupancy of all Territories and Indulgencies of which they were then in Possession. Anno 1716, The Spanish Ambassador at the Court of Great-Britain [Marquis de Monteleone] entered a Complaint to the King in Council, against the English Subjects Cutters of Logwood in the Bays of Campeche, &c: This was referred to the Board of Trade and Plantation [by letter from Mr. Secretary Methuen dated November 15, 1716 but reviewed by the Board 8 months later on July 12, 1717]; they made Report [on September 25, 1717 - see Calendar for 1717, Item No. 104] that "By the American Treaty Anno 1670, there was confirmed to the Crown of Great-Britain, a Right to the Laguna de Terminos (Bay of Campeche) and Parts adjacent in the Province of Jucatan; these Places at the Time of the Treaty, and some Years before, being actually in Possession of the British Subjects through Right of Sufferance or Indulgence." This same Right or Liberty is absolutely granted and confirmed by the Treaty of Utrecht 1713. Notwithstanding of this Representation, and without allowing sufficient Time for the Logwood Cutters to withdraw (if the Court of Great-Britain had judged it proper) the Spaniards from Tobasco, drove them off, it has never since been used by the British. […] That Year in which this Logwood-Bay was cut off, Anno 1717, were imported into the Port of London 5,863 Tuns [sic] Logwood. Since our People have been dislodged from the Bay of Campeche, they followed the same Business in the Bay of Honduras on the East Side of Jucatan, their Dye-Wood [Logwood] is not so good, and the Mouths of their Rivers (Old and New River) are more shallow." SPANISH GUARDA COSTAS OPERATING FROM TOWN OF CAMPEACHY (S.t Francisco de
Campeche ON POPPLE'S MAP). THE AMERICAN WEEKLY MERCURY [Philadelphia], From Thursday,
February, 19. to Tuesday, February 24. 1729-30. No. 529. Philadelphia, February 19. Monday last arrived
here the Sloop Olive Branch, N. Legall Master, she left Jamaica in the Fall, being bound for this Place, but
was taken by a Spanish Guard la Coast and carried into Campeachy, where she was detained two Month;
and though the Spaniards could find nothing on board, that might make her a lawful Prize, it cost the
Merchants 700 Pieces of Eight, in Presents to the Officers, &c. before they could get away." | |||||
| AMERICAN LOGWOOD CUTTING IN THE BAY OF CAMPEACHY (Gray 1730): "By the late Treaty
of Peace with Spain we are told, that all the British damages which we have received by the Spaniards since
the solemn Peace of Utrecht, will by agreement have reparation […] I shall […] set forth a great national
damage done by the Spaniards in taking the Bay of Campeachy from us soon after ye abovesaid Treaty
[…] Our right to that place is evident by your report to the House of Commons […] I have known America
near 40 years […] in Virginia and Maryland […] their [American] ships lie in rivers where there is not any
house near them, and fastned by their cables to trees; in Campeachy the ships ride at anchor by a little
island called Treist [sic], at the enterance of that Bay, and the logwood which they goe thither to load, some
of it may be cut the best part of 100 miles up the country; In Virginia […] many time they have only a man
and boy left on board a ship of 400 tons […] So it is in the Bay of Campeachy, they fetch their logwood in
boats […] so that the men belonging to the ships, they were gone up the country up in the woods". Gray
estimates here the damage done by Spain taking the Bay of Campeachy at £1,239,000, and the value of the
ships seized by the Spaniards since then at about the same amount. "This damage is of more value than all
the Navy of Spain."
ENGLISH & NEW ENGLAND LOGWOOD TRADERS IN THE BAY OF CAMPECHÉ, 1730. THE AMERICAN WEEKLY MERCURY [Philadelphia], From Thursday, February, 19. to Tuesday, February 24. 1729-30. No. 529. "New-York, February 16. On Saturday last two Sloops arrived here one from Jamaica, the other from South-Carolina, the first gives Account, That the Spaniards have taken 14 English Vessels in the Bay, and 10 of the Masters were come to Jamaiaca [sic] before they left the Island, and two of said Masters are come to New-York: That a Spanish Pirate also lately took a large Sloop belonging to Mr. Fanniel of Boston, and in cold Blood cut the Master and all his Men to pieces, saving only the Cabbin-Boy." Galfridus Gray writes that this report was printed in the London Daily Post-Boy on May 26, 1730 (not reviewed ). Gray makes it clear that he understood the "English Vessels" and the New England "Sloop belonging to Mr. Fanniel of Boston" to be ships of logwood traders in the Bay of Campeachy. Gray (1730): "Your Lordships know that the logwood trade must be a great advantage to the Nation, both to the Crown and subjects, it was wholly in our hands, it paid 4l. per tun duty to the King, and altho' the common price in the Bay [of Campeachy] was 5l. per tun, the merchant had a sufficient profit, it sold for 13 sometimes up to 18 or 20l. per tun; that it was a great advantage is evident by the risques run to get it, since the bay have been taken from us, contrary to Treaty [of Utrecht]; By so late an account as the 26th of last month, we are told in the daily Post Boy, 14 more of our ships are taken by them [Spaniards]; also in the same paper, it is said, that the Spaniard had taken another belonging to New England, and cut all that sloop's Company to peices [sic] in cold blood, only the cabin boy escaped, this is not a singular instance, but a late one." NEW ENGLAND MEN IN BAY OF HONDURAS, 1730. THE AMERICAN WEEKLY MERCURY [Philadelphia], From Thursday, June 11. to Thursday, June 18. 1730. No. 546. "Philadelphia, June 18. We have Advice by Capt. Burrows, from the Bay of Honduras (but last from Jamaica) that when he was in the Bay, in February last; the Spaniards had taken Seven sail of Vessels, most of them New England and Rhode-Island Men, and likewise Capt. Burrows Sloop, but his Men, and the Bay Men from the shore, fired so briskly on the Spaniards, they were forced to quit her, and so got his Sloop again, also a Brigantine which was afterwards taken." EMANUEL BOWEN on Laguna Termina shown on Popple's 20-Sheet Map (Bowen 1747, 607-608): "The
Spaniards having denied the Right of the English to cut Logwood in its Bay, […] the matter was referred to
the Board of Trade, who made a Report, 'That the Bay of Campeachy might so far be call'd the property of
England, that the English for some Years before, as well as after the American Treaty in 1670, enjoy'd an
uninterrupted Liberty of cutting Logwood in the Laguna de Terminos (which lies at the bottom of the Bay)
and other Places not inhabited by the Spaniards in the Province of Jucatan, either through Right,
Sufferance, or Indulgence: That the said Treaty even established a Right in the British Crown to the said
Laguna and Parts adjacent, which had been for some Years before, as well as at the time of the Treaty, in
the Possession of the English ; and that though the Right of the British Crown to the said Laguna should not
be insisted on, the same Liberty was actually granted and confirmed by the Treaty of Commerce at Utrecht.'" | ||||||
| JOHN HARRIS IN 1748 ON THE BOARD'S 1717 "REPRESENTATION" REGARDING LOGWOOD
TRADE (Harris 1748, 268-69): "This Matter came to be considered with the utmost Care and
Circumspection by the Board of Trade and Plantations in the Year 1717, who solemnly reported that we
[the English] had an undoubted Right to that Trade, in which the Subjects of the Crown of England had
been maintained and supported by former Kings, his Majesty's Royal Predecessors. They observe, that
Logwood is the Product of Jucatan, a Peninsula that extends itself an hundred Leagues into the North Sea,
on each Side whereof are the Bays of Campeachy and Honduras, where the Wood is chiefly cut by the
English. The Spaniards are possessed only of the Town of Campeachy, and two more small Places in this
part of America, and that the rest of Jucatan was an an uninhabited Desart [sic], 'till our Logwood Cutters
settled at Cape Catoch, the North East Promontory of Jucatan, or at Trist, or the Laguna de Terminos in the
Bay of Campeachy, before, or in, the Year 1667, when a Treaty of Peace was concluded between Great
Britain and Spain […] Then the Lords Commissioners proceeded to shew the Importance of the Logwood
Trade to Great Britain, […] which cannot be computed at less than 60,000 l. per Annum, […] Upon the
whole, they gave it as their Opinion, that some Time before, and long after, the Year 1670, the Subjects of
England were possessed of, and quietly enjoyed, Part of the Country of Jucatan, uninhabited by the
Spaniards, and consequently the Right of British Subjects, to cut Logwood, and even to settle in that
Country, was not only certain and apparent, but was also settled and confirmed by the Treaty ["by a Clause
in the Treaty of Commerce, concluded in November 1713"]". | ||||||
| Note 25 | DANIEL DEFOE ON NEW ENGLAND LOGWOOD TRADING IN THE BAY OF CAMPECHÉ, 1728
([Defoe] 1728a, 301-302): "Tabasco. This Country of Tabasco joining to the Peninsula of Yucatan, the
Coast runs away East far into the Sea at least three hundred Miles: and the turning off [sic] the Shore,
which before went away South, turns East, the Bite or Nook of which Turning is call'd the Bay of
Campeachy, where our English Sailors (Rogues I should say) cut Logwood; and from which Trade they too
often turn Buccaneers, and of late Pirates and High-Sea Robbers, of which hereafter. […]
This Trade of Logwood, the cutting of which has render'd the Bay of Campeachy such a Den of Thieves, is in short this: That whenever the Sailors get in Debt or desperate Circumstances, either at Jamaica or any where else in that Part of the World, they have no way to recover their Fortunes, but to get Passage on board any Vessel going to Campeachy for Logwood, and so go on Shore and fall to work: The whole Cargo the Man carries with him, is a Sett of Axes and Hatchets, Saws and great Knives, with an Iron Crow, a small Grindstone, a Gun with store of Powder and Ball, and Small-shot, a Tent, and a Sea Bed; all these go into a Chest, and the Bed and Tent are ty'd to it; so that his Baggage is not much in Bulk, and the Ships will give him his Passage for his Work.Here his Business is to cut Logwood, as near the Water-side as he can. The Ketches from New England at a certain time coming to Jamaica with Provisions, and wanting Freight back, come hither to load Logwood; and finding Logwood-cutters well furnish'd, they buy it of them. Sometimes if a Man works hard, and loses no time, and especially if two or three work together, they shall lay up in one Season very considerable Piles of Wood; and if they are minded to leave the Place, any of the Ships will take them in, and carry them away. Now thus far, for the first part, it is all honest and fair; but then comes the wicked part: When any Gang of ill-designing Fellows at Jamaica, (for there it generally begins) among the English, or at Martinico among the French, have a mind to go upon the Account, (so they call the Buccaneering or Pirating Trade) they have nothing to do but fit out a Sloop or a Ship, and away to Sea; and not finding Hands enough, or not being willing to take too many on board publickly, lest they should be discover'd, away they go to the Bay of Campeachy, and to the Harbour of Triest, for Men: Here coming among the Logwood-cutters, and giving them good Store of Liquors, telling them fine Stories of the glorious Designs they have in their Heads, they never fail to get as many bold Fellows well arm'd, and all good Seamen too, as they please. And thus the Buccaneers and Pirates also have often been mann'd, and often recruited too, when they have been in Distress for Men to prosecute their Adventures. And this is what I call the wicked part of it. But the Spaniards, who have better look'd after their Affairs in America of late than ever they did, have almost broke the Neck of this Trade since the Year 1722, when five Spanish Frigates, whereof two carried 44 Guns each, came into the Bay, took or burnt 12 English Ships belonging to New England, New York, and the Colonies thereabouts, and burnt all the Logwood they could find already cut, pursuing the Fellows that had cut it as ar as they could into the Woods, where many of them were kill'd; and the rest had as well have been kill'd, for being left without Tools to work, or Ships to carry them off, they must certainly have perish'd, or been oblig'd to surrender to the Spaniards, which they always think worse than Death. And thus ended the Rendezvous, nor is it ever likely to be carried on again. The Logwood Trade was carried on chiefly at an Island or two, in the Mouth of a small River just in the
Bottom of this Bay: The Islands are call'd, 1. Triest Island; 2. Port Royal Island: And within the River there
is another call'd One-Bush-Key.The Waters within these Islands are call'd the Logwood Creeks: And as the
Spanish Men of War could not come into these Creeks, so the Logwood-cutters had time to bury their Axes
and other Tools, and prepare to defend themselves: But when the Spaniards appear'd with their Boats well
mann'd, the Cutters soon found they were too weak to stand it, and fled; those that did so early, got away,
but some that were too bold fought desperately, and were all cut in pieces by the Spaniards. […]" | |||||
| Note 26 | ADMIRAL CHARLES WAGER'S COMMENTS ON LOGWOOD CUTTING, 1738 (Wager 1738):
Charles Wager's November 8, 1738 LETTER to Andrew Stone: "Admty Office 8th Nov: 1738 […] I have
read over the Project of the Treaty, intended to be made with Spain, […] I have writt some days ago a few
Observations on the West India Trade in general, a copy of which I herewith send you […]". Charles
Wager's OBSERVATIONS enclosed with his November 8, 1738 Letter to Andrew Stone: "Relating to the
Cutting Logwood it is to be observd [sic] that since the English have been driven out of the Bay of
Campechy by the Spaniards they have carry [sic] on the Trade of Logwood Cutting in the Bay of Honduras
which is in the same Province of Yuchetan and on the other side of the Land or E. side." | |||||
| Note 27 | PHILIPPE BUACHE'S MAP OF GULF OF MEXICO. "Carte d'une Partie de l'Amerique pour la
Navigation des Isles et du Golfe du Mexique avec l'interieur des Terres depuis la Bermude jusqu'a
Cayenne" (Tooley 1985, No. 91). Later editions from the same plates. By J.A. Dezauche in 1780 (Tooley
1985, No. 92); by J.A. Dezauche in 1792 (Tooley 1985, No. 93; T Smith & Thomas 1963, No. 167A). See
also Sellers & Van Ee (1981, No. 1707) [note 52]. On 2 sheets - the left (492mm height x 293mm width) is
a single-page sheet without border on right, the right (492mm height x 656mm width) sheet is double-page
with border on all 4 sides. Left border of double-page sheet is trimmed when sheets are joined - as seen
above. Map title above border fits entirely on double-page sheet. Double-page sheet serves by itself as a
map of the West Indies Islands. The complete 2-sheet map is described in Julien (1752, 127), as being on
"1. f[euille]. & dem[i-feuille]." Tooley (1985) incorrectly states that the map is on three sheets. Size when
joined: 928mm width x 492mm height. This map is rare. The map appeared in Guillaume Delisle's and
Philippe Buache's Atlas Géographique et Universel, LC Call No.: G1015.L575 1763 Cage (Phillips 1909,
No. 3456). Buache drew a manuscript map of the Gulf of Mexico even before Popple published his map.
The 1726 original and a 1729 copy (?) of Buache's 1726 manuscript map are both in the Ayer Collection at
the Newberry Library and are described in Smith (1927, Item No. 180-81): (1) Carte reduite des côtes du
Golfe du Mexique et des isles de l'Amerique, ou est marquée la route des galleons. Dressée par Ph:
Buache sur les observations astronomiques faites à St. Domingue &c. conciliées avec ce qu'il y a de plus
exact sur ces côtes, et augmentées sur les observations particulieres rapportées dans les memoires du
depost de la Marine. 19 Xbre, 1726 (1070 mm x 670 mm, colored); (2) Carte reduite des costes du Golfe
du Mexique et des isles de l'Amerique, ou sont marquées la route des gallions, et celle de la flotte. Dressée
en 1726 par Phillipe Buache, hydrographe du Dépost des cartes de la Marine […] Executée en 1729 de
l'ordre de M. le Chever. de la Blandiniere (944 mm x 613 mm, colored). | |||||
| Note 28 | ANNOTATION ON 1752 MAP REGARDING LOGWOOD TRADE DISPUTES BETWEEN BRITAIN
AND SPAIN. Map engraved "For M.r Postlethwayte's Dictionary of Trade & Commerce" (imprint below
bottom border). Map title in cartouche on right: "NORTH AMERICA. Performed under the Patronage of
LOUIS DUKE OF ORLEANS, FIRST PRINCE OF THE BLOOD; BY THE SIEUR D'ANVILLE. Greatly
Improved by M.r BOLTON. Engrav'd by R. W. Seale. MDCCLII." Imprint below cartouche: "Printed for
John and Paul Knapton. Gravelot delin. Walker sculp." [LOCATIONS: Yale-Sterling Library Map
Collection; P.R.O. (Penfold 1974, No. 47); NYSL-Albany; National Archives (McLaughlin 1971, No. 23).
This is an English copy of D'Anville's 1746 map.] One of the notes engraved on the map: "N.B. […] This
large Map of North America was originally engrav'd at Paris, and cost the late Duke of Orleans 1000
Pounds drawing and engraving; which we have translated into English with many Improvements, and will
be deliver'd in four parts, in this Work gratis: Also South America, which cost as much as the former,
copied from the same Author, in three large Sheets with great Improvements, will be deliver'd in the same
manner: And the Reader may be assur'd, that due care will be taken in this Work, in our Description of the
several parts of America which belong to Great Britain by Treaty, to ascertain the just Rights of the Nation,
both with respect to extent of Territory, as well as the liberty of Trade, wherein will be more particularly
shewn how far we have an equitable Claim to the cutting of LOGWOOD: from which the Spaniards still
attempt presumptuously to exclude us, and are likely ever to make that a Pretence to obstruct our lawful
Navigation to & from our Colonies; unless this point is so regulated with that Crown as to prevent any
future misunderstanding between the two Kingdoms: As this point alone may be said to have been the
principal Cause of the late War, & therefore to have cost the Nation thirty Millions of Money [sic]; so it is
to be greatly desired by every true Friend to the Kingdom, this matter may be finally & satisfactorily
regulated on both sides, in order to avoid the future Calamities of War, upon the same Occasion: With an
Expedient, most humbly submitted to public Consideration, to prevent any Broils hereafter on this account
between Great Britain and Spain, by Malachy Postlethwayt, 1752." | |||||
| Note 29 | LOGWOOD TRADE CONVENTION BETWEEN BRITAIN AND SPAIN SIGNED JULY 14, 1786.
William Faden published in London on February 1, 1787 a map entitled: "A MAP OF A PART OF
YUCATAN, or of that Part of the Eastern Shore within the Bay of Honduras Alloted to Great Britain for
the Cutting of Logwood. In consequence of the Convention signed with Spain on the 14th of July, 1786. By a
Bay-Man." Location: LC. [Phillips (1901, 1136); Maps of Hispanic America (1930, 110); An Important
Collection of Printed Maps mainly issued prior to 1800 relating to North America and the West Indies
(Charles F. Heartman auction catalog No. 241, Wednesday, September 28, 1932, Metuchen, NJ), Item No.
93.] | |||||
| Note 30 | FRENCH "PASSAGES" FROM CANADA TO LOUISIANA SHOWN ON POPPLE'S MAP. [Calendar,
Item No. 450] March 19, 1718. Letter from Board of Trade to William Keith. "We send you here inclosed
[sic] the copy of a Memorial lately laid before us concerning the progress the French have made in finding
out and securing a passage from St. Lawrence or Canada River to their new settlemt. called Louisiana and
down ye River Missisipi [sic] in the Bay of Mexico; whereupon we must desire you to inform yourself as
particularly as you can of the facts therein mentioned to acquaint us therewith as soon as possible and give
us your sentiments, what methods may be most proper to be taken for preventing the inconveniencies to
which H. M. Plantations on the continent of America and the trade of this Kingdom may be subject by such
a communication between the French settlements." P.R.O. C.O. 5, 1293. ff. 138-141.
(Keith 1719) February 16, 1719. "From the time that the French first discovered the River Mechasippi they have with great care endeavoured and at length have actually settled a communication between Canada and the Southern countries on the said river. First they sail in cannoes from Mount Real about three leagues to the fall of St. Lewis, where they have a portage or carrying place by land about half a league; then they reimbark and row up the stream about sixty leagues to Fort Frontenac on the North side and at the beginning of Lake Ontario. […] From thence they proceed on the Lake Ontario, generally reputed to be about eighty leagues in length, to those dreadful Falls of Niagara, which oblige them to land; the portage is about three leagues; after which they reimbark and go up the Strait about six leagues into the Lake Erie, reputed to be 130 leagues in length. And from this Lake they have three different routs to the River Mechasippi. The first and shortest passage by water is to go up the River Miamis or Ouamis that enters Lake Erie on the South West, about 150 leagues, then they come to a carrying place of about three leagues, where is the highest land, and from hence the waters divide their descent between Mechasippi and that Lake; Here they embark on a small shallow river called la Riviere de Portage, down which they row forty leagues to the River Wabash or Ouabache, and on that river, as the traders reckon, 120 leagues to the River Ohio, into which the other falls, then 80 leagues down Ohio to Mechasippi, and thence 350 leagues to the Bay of Mexico. […] The other two passages are both prick'd down in Hennepin's Map [*] and according to the accounts given are thus, From the North East of Lake Erie they sail eight leagues to a fort on the Lake St. Claire, called Pont Chartrain […]; then along the Lake seven leagues, thence to the great Lake Huron about ten leagues; On this Lake they proceed to the Straits Missilimakina 120 leagues. […] From the Lake Huron they pass by the Strait Missilimakina four leagues, being two in breadth and of a great depth, to the Lake Illinois, thence 150 leagues on the Lake to Fort Miami situate on the mouth of the River Chigagou [**]; This Fort is not regularly garrisoned. […] Up the River Chigagou they sail but three leagues to a portage of a quarter of a league, then they enter a small lake of about a mile, and have another very small portage, and again another of two miles to the River Illinois, thence down the same 130 leagues to Mechasippi. The third is from Missilimakina on the Lake Illinois to the Lake des Puans ninety leagues, thence to the River Puans eighty leagues, thence up the same to a portage about four miles over to the River Ouisconsing, thence forty leagues to the Mechasippi." [*] - Keith's reference to "Hennepin's Map" is probably to the 1698 map "A MAP || of a Large Country || Newly Discovered || in the || NORTHERN AMERICA || Situated between || NEW MEXICO || And the Frozen Sea || together with the Course || of the Great River || MESCHASIPI || Dedicated to his Ma.ty || WILLIAM III || King of Great Britain || By Father || LEWIS HENNEPIN || Missionary Recollect and || Apostolic Notary" [for picture of map and analysis see Benson (1995, No. 8B)] which first appeared in "A New Discovery of a Vast Country in America, Extending above Four Thousand Miles, Between New France and New Mexico; with a Description of the Great Lakes, Cataracts, Rivers, Plants, and Animals. […] By L. Hennepin, now Resident in Holland. […] LONDON, Printed for M. Bentley, J. Tonson, H. Bonwick, T. Goodwin, and S. Manship. 1698" (Howes 1994, H406). This map contains the "prick'd" French travel "passages" between "Frontenac Fort" and the "Mouth of the Meschasipi" - one along "Illinois R" from "Fort of Miamis", the other along "Ouisconsing R" from the unnamed bay (Puans Bay) next to "Cape Puans". The map is of size 427 mm width x 368 mm height. This map with English place-names is a slightly reduced version, from a different plate, of the original 1697 map "CARTE || d'un tres grand PAIS || Nouvellement découvert || dans || L'AMERIQUE SEPTENTRIONALE || entre le || NOUVEAU MEXIQUE et la || Mer Glaciale || avec le Cours du Grand Fleuve || MESCHASIPI || Dedieé a || GUILIAUME IIIE || Roy de la Grand Brettagne || Par le R. P. || LOUIS DE HENNEPIN || Mission: Recoll: et Not: Apost: || Chez G. BROEDELET || a Utreght" [for picture of map see Johnson (1974, 150-151)] which first appeared in "Nouvelle Decouverte d'un Tres Grand Pays Situé dans l'Amerique, entre Le Nouveau Mexique, et La Mer Glaciale, […] Par Le R. P. Louis Hennepin, Missionaire Recollect & Notaire Apostolique. A Utrecht, Chez Guillaume Broedelet, Marchand Libraire. MDCXCVII." (Howes 1994, H406). The 1697 map with French place-names also contains the "prick'd" French travel "passages" between "Fort de Fontenac [sic]" and the "Embouchure de Meschasipi" - one along "R. des Illinois" from "Fort des Miamis", the other along "Riviere Ouisconsing" from "Baye de Puans". The map is of size 442 mm width x 375 mm height. [**] -- Buisseret (1991) states that Fort Miami did not exist: "Popple had to rely […] on French sources for
his information, which is why the place-names are a curious mixture of French and English. At the head of
Green Bay we recognize the "Mission de Saint François Xavier," and at the future site of Chicago the
(imaginary) Fort 'Miamis'." | |||||
| Gordon (1731) enclosed with his March 15, 1731 letter to the Board of Trade and Plantations [see note 10]
"a paper drawn up in 1718 by Mr. Logan, a gentleman of good literature and large experience, who
having been himself engaged in the Indian trade, from the informations he collected from some who had
long and often travelled through Canada, and the country about Missassippi [sic], drew up at the request of
Sir Wm. Keith then Governor of this Province an account of the French trade, their routes and their Indians
[…] to be transmitted to your Board in answer to some queries then sent him. How Sir William might
transmitt it I know not, but as it appears to me curious and valueable, with that gentleman's leave, who has
lent me his original draught, I here give you an exact copy". A review of Logan's paper shows that Keith in
his February 16, 1719 letter to the Board copied Logan almost word for word - including Logan's
statements about "Fort Miami situate on the mouth of the River Chigagow" and the "two passages" "both
prick'd down in Hennepin's map". | ||||||
| Note 31 | C&M ATLAS NOUVEAU WITH ADVERTISEMENT LEAF [C&M 8]. YALE, Call No.: 1973 Folio 14.
Collation basically follows Koeman (1969, C&M 8). Contains C&M 4-Sheet map in State 3b, C&M Key
map in State 2. Printed contents sheet with enumeration of maps and 14 lines of advertisement text at
bottom, slightly smaller than mapsheets, bound in front, with title: "LISTE DES CARTES
GEOGRAPHIQUES DE G. DE LISLE. Augmentée des plusieurs Nouvelles Cartes & mis au jour par le
soin de J. CÓVENS & C. MORTIER. A AMSTERDAM." 140 maps listed. The advertisement text states:
"On pourra aussi avoir les Cartes ci-dessus imprimées sur de très-beau Taffetas ou Satin, au reste les Cartes
suivantes imprimée sur du papier de même sur du Taffetas ou Satin en feuilles ou bien collé sur de la toile
& avec des Cadres: […] L'Amérique Septentrionale par le Dr. Mitchell 8 feuil. L'Amérique
Septentrionale avec le Golfe de Mexique par Popple 7 feuilles. […] Toutes les Cartes Angloises par H.
Moll, […]". This text in loose translation states that the maps could be also purchased printed directly on
Taffeta or Satin and that some (including C&M's copies of Popple) could be purchased with the printed
paper sheets laid on Taffeta or Satin, or laid on canvas with rollers as wall maps. The Newberry Library
C&M 4-Sheet map in State 3b (Call No.: AYER 133 P83 1733 BOX) appears to be such a copy - with each
sheet segmented and laid on linen (Satin/Taffeta?). | |||||
| Note 32 | Charles Theodore Middleton's 2-volume A New and Complete System of Geography (Sabin 1885, No.
48854) was published in London by J. Cooke in 1778-1779 with 120 engraved plates. In 1782 Cooke
published a revised edition of this work with a description of the American Revolution and the events at
Saratoga of October 1781. This 1782 edition has 121 plates listed in the Directions to the Binder, including
The Great Cataract or Waterfall, of Niagara in North America view after Popple. | |||||
| Note 33 | SOURCE OF POPPLE'S ISLAND IN THE MOUTH OF THE ALATAMAHA RIVER? Manuscript map
of the Mouth of Alatamaha river by Col. John Barnwell, c. 1721. COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, Rare Books &
Manuscripts, Call No.: Historical Map Collection P - America N., N.o 255. Not listed in Cumming (1998).
This is one in a series of small single-sheet maps, most attributable to Barnwell, depicting the area of Fort
King George and the mouth of the Alatamaha River drawn in 1721-22. See Cumming (1998, Nos. 178-79,
185-89).
Brown ink and grey wash (?) color. Title in cartouche at bottom left: "A || Map or Plan of || the mouth of Alat || amaha: River || with the Adjacent Lands." The map covers an area of about 36 miles east-west and 32 miles north-south in length, centered around the outlet of the Alatamaha River into the Atlantic Ocean. At the outlet of the Alatamaha River "Fort King George" is shown and nearby, within the river to the west, separated from the Fort by "Cyprus swamp" and "Swampy Land", is "A Large Cyprus Island". The Alatamaha river is shown from its mouth to a few miles inland. Surrounding the river on the south-west and north-east sides are swamp lands delimited by lines running basically parallel to the river. The annotations within these river-bordering strips of land are: on the south-west side - "Between the line and the River is Cyprus Swamps", on the north-east side - "Between the Line and the River is low Cyprus Swamp". Close to and south-west of Ft. King George the land is labeled "Swampy Land", "Cyprus swamp" and in two places "Swamp". Two roads are shown by dotted lines ending at Ft. King George. The road running north-west from the Fort along the Alatamaha River is labeled "Road to the Okonees", the other road running straight north is labeled "Road to Pallachucolas". The coastal waters in the ocean are labeled "Shoal Water" and a number of soundings both in "Feet" and "Fathoms" are shown. The inlet off Doboy Island is labeled "This Inlett not well Sounded so uncertain". A Scale of Miles is shown above the title cartouche labeled: "A Scale of Seven Miles a mile in half an Inch". Map border: two parallel lines, 2 mm apart. Paper watermarked just above title cartouche with "Strasburg Bend & Lily" of the type shown in Churchill
(1935, Nos. 429-34 and 436-37). No countermark found, i.e. the direction of tilt in the lines within the
shield cannot be established - seen differently from recto and verso of map. The height of the watermark
from top tip of fleur-de-lis to bottom tip of shield is 121 mm. The watermark found on Barnwell's large c.
1721 map of the Southeast (Cumming 1998, Nos. 184A) is a Strasburg Bend and Lily similar to Churchill
(1935, Nos. 437). In bottom left corner, within borders, green ink stamp of Garden Library, New York
Southern Society. Size within borders: 467 mm wide x 416 mm high. Map originally was separate and
folded into 4 sections along vertical and horizontal centerfolds. At some point later the map was bound into
an atlas or book - remains of old guard present along the vertical centerfold. Cumming (1998, No. 177)
describes a manuscript map by Barnwell at the P.R.O., London [Call No. C.O. 700, No. 1], entitled A Map
or Plan of the Mouth of Alatamahaw River with the adjacent Lands, c. 1721, slightly smaller (464 mm x
410 mm), with identical scale of 1 mile in half an inch, but without any soundings. The proposed fort on St.
Simons Island is not mentioned in Cumming's description of No. 177. | |||||
| Note 34 | MANUSCRIPT ORIGINAL OF POPPLE'S SHEET 6? This single sheet is a part of the Rochambeau Map
Collection in the Geography and Map Division. Cataloged as G3700 1708.E8 Roch 35 it is incorrectly dated
by LC to 1708. Originally, it was on one sheet of wove paper. At some point it was dissected and placed on
linen, probably in the 18th century. Probably sometime in the 20th century, after its acquisition by the
Library of Congress, the map was taken off the original linen, assembled together into one piece and placed
on new linen. The face of the map was then covered with a thin, transparent, finely meshed silk cloth - a
lamination technique no longer used for restoration of maps by the Library of Congress. On the verso of the
original linen there was a manuscript label: Etats Unis: Partie Septentrionale. Prior to mounting on new
20th century linen a large negative copy of the map was made. The index card describing this negative, at
the Yale University Sterling Library Map Collection, dates the original manuscript map to 1753 and
describes it as a "copy" of the engraved copperplate. In the right margin of the map there is a large
manuscript letter "B", while at the edge of the bottom right margin one can see part of a large manuscript
letter "A". This indicates that there was probably a similarly mounted (on 18th century linen) manuscript
Sheet 10 map of Popple's 20-sheet map - not located by the author. Cape May and Cape Hinlopen are not
named. The paper size of the manuscript Sheet 6 map is 518 mm height x 733 mm width. Size between
outermost gridlines of this manuscript map (latitude and longitude lines) is 485 mm height x 668 mm
width. Size of engraved Sheet 6 between outermost gridlines is 492 mm height x 685 mm. Spacing
between the chain lines of the wove paper on which the map is drawn is about 27 mm. | |||||
| Note 35 | BOWEN'S TABLE COMPARING HIS MAP WITH POPPLE'S on his SEQUEL TO THE SEAT OF WAR,
1740.
"A Table comparing this, with M.r Popple's, Map of the British Empire in America, 1733. | |||||
| Puerto Bello Lat. Long. Observed by Pere Feuillée in 1704. 9o. 33'. 5'79o. 45' By M.r P.'s Map 9. 54 82. 25 which errs 0. 20. 55 2. 40 |
Panamâ Lat. Long. Observed by de Herrera 17178o. 58'. 50" 79o. 41' By M.r P.'s Map8. 54. 0 82. 0 which errs 0.4. 502. 19 | |||||
| The difference of Lat.d (being nearly the direct distance), between these two places, according to this Map
& the Observations is 34.¼ Geographical Miles, or about 39½ English; according to M.r Popple's is 60
Geographical or 69¼ English Miles, or near double ye true distance. The difference of Long.d by this Map
is 4 miles; by M.r Popple's, 25. According to Moll's Puerto Bello is in Lat.d 9o. 50' Long.d 81o. 40'
Panama Lattitude 8o. 52'. Long.d 81o. 22'. M.r Popple's Map makes Puerto Bello (even contrary to his own
plan) a Shallow Bay or Road 15 miles wide & opening due North; Puts ye Bastimentos 10 miles from Shore,
that are but ½ a mile; & the mouth of ye Châgré 9 leagues only due west, but makes it 7 wide." [See also
note 41]
Bowen's Vast Atlantic Ocean, 1740, Foster's Seat of War, 1740 and Foster's February 22, 1740
advertisement in The Daily Post contain the same numerically specific critiques of Popple's
Longitude/Latitude positioning of "Puerto Bello" as Bowen's Sequel above. The following year Thomas
Gardner used Foster/Bowen's data to criticize Popple by name at p. 63 of his Description of the Principal
Objects of the Present War, 1741. In turn Campbell (1741) used Gardner's description to also comment on
Popple's map. Referring to Popple as "Some Author", Campbell writes in his description of "Porto Bello"
at p. 185-8: "Some Authors place it in the Latitude of 9o 54', and in the Longitude of 82o 52' [sic] [last 2
digits transposed], whereas in reality it lies in 9o 33' Latitude, and in 79o 45' Longitude, that is, West from
London." The actual position of Porto Bello is Lat. 9o35'N, Long. 79o42W [Oxford Atlas of the World, 6th
ed., 1998], thus Foster/Bowen/Gardner/Campbell's criticism of Popple on this issue was justified. | ||||||
| Note 36 | JACQUES NICOLAS BELLIN'S CRITICISM OF POPPLE'S MAP.
Bellin (1741-51, 5-6): PANAMA. "Côtes de l'Amérique depuis la Californie jusqu'au Cap de Horn. […] Suivant ces observations Panama est placé 82. degrez 6. minutes à l'Occident du Méridien de Paris; cette détermination Astronomique est d'autant plus certaine qu'elle résulte de deux observations rapportées dans les Mémoires de l'Académie des Sciences, qui ont été faites en différens tems, & par des (a) Observateurs différens. Elle est encore appuyée par la longitude de Portobello qui a été observée par le P. Feuillé & M. Couplet le fils. Cette détermination est différente des Cartes Angloises & Hollandoises; par exemple la Carte de l'Amérique que le célebre M. Halley a publiée en 1700. & la nouvelle Carte de M. Pople [sic], mettent Panama 82. degrez 5. minutes à l'occident du Méridien de Londres, ce qui revient à 84. degrez 30. minutes du Méridien de Paris; & par conséquent portent cette place deux degrez 20. minutes trop à l'Ouest." Bellin (1744, iii): "Cependant je ne puis me dispenser de parler de la grande Carte Angloise de l'Amérique Septentrionnale en 20 feuilles, publiée depuis quelques années par M. Popple, sous le nom d'Empire Anglois dans l'Amérique. Comme cette Carte est à plus grand point & plus détaillée, qu'aucune autre: beaucoup de personnes l'ont regardée comme un bon Ouvrage, auquel on pourroit avoir quelque confiance; mais il s'en faut bien, que cela foit ainsi, & je le prouverai dans la suite." Bellin (1746, 72): "I cannot omit, however, taking notice of the large English map of North America, publish'd some years ago by Mr Popple, by the title of the British empire in America. As this map is of a greater compass, and more circumstantial, than any other, many have been led to regard it as a good performance, which might be depended on; but that the case is quite otherwise, I shall easily make appear in the sequel, after I have first premised some account of the construction of my maps, and shewn the reader the principal remarks I have made use of, and the alterations they have produced." Bellin (1744, xii): "Revenons à ma Carte des Lacs. [CARTE DES LACS DU CANADA (Kershaw 1993-97, No. 946-947)] […] Qu'on ne foit donc point surpris de voir que je fais courir le Lac Ontario Est & Ouest, tandis que la Carte de la Louysiane de M. Delille le fait courir Est Nord-Est & Ouest Sud-Ouest; & la Carte de Popple, Nord-Est & Sud-Ouest. Cette derniere marque le Fort de Cataroucoui à l'entrée du Lac Ontario, près d'un degré trop Septentrionnal." Bellin (1746, 72): The comments of Bellin regarding the Great Lakes are not present in this translation. Bellin (1744, iv): "[l'Isle de Terre-Neuve.] Ainsi nous constatons avec la plus grande évidence la longueur de cette Isle du Nord au Sud, que la Carte Angloise [de Popple] fait d'un dégré trop grande. Sa largeueur de l'Est à l'Ouest est déterminée par les routes des Navigateurs, qui s'accordent à trouver du Cap de Rase au Cap de Raye, environ 80. lieuës; ils donnent aussi la latitude du Cap de Raye de 47. dégrés, 30. à 35. minutes. La Carte de Popple ne met que 50. lieuës entre ces deux Caps & place ce derniere 20. minutes trop Nord". Bellin (1746, 72): "So that from the best evidence I have given the true length of this isle, which the English map makes a degree too long. Its breadth from E. to W. is determin'd by all navigators, who agree that from Cape Raz to Cape Raye, is about 80 leagues, and that Cape Raye lies in Lat. 47o 30', or 35', whereas Mr. Popple's map allows but 50 leagues distance, and places the latter 20' too far N." Bellin (1746, 74): "Let my draught of this famous river [river St Laurence] be now compared with Mr
Popple's, and the difference will appear surprising between us. For example, the breadth of the river at
Matane, in mine, is 12 leagues, in his it is 28. In his the seven isles lie to the north of Matane, whereas they
lie to the north east. The whole course of the river is equally defective in the English map. The one half of
the islands are omitted, and the rest have neither their just proportions or situation." | |||||
| Note 37 | BELLIN'S LETTER TO THE ROYAL SOCIETY IN LONDON, APRIL 20, 1752 (Bellin 1752): "[…]
Quelques persones trouveront peut etre que J'ay repandu un peu trop de critique contre les Cartes
angloises et hollandoises, Jen'ay pas plus epargné les Cartes françoises: mais cette critique n'arien
d'offensant pour les uns et pour les autres: car comme ce genre d'Etude n'a d'autre but que d'approcher le
plus qu il est possible de La Verité, elle devient un flambeau Necessaire pour se guider dans les tenebres
dont on est environé: et je suis persuadé que tout Sçavant qui selivre al Etude de l'hydrographie et al a
Construction des Cartes Marines, est autant flaté d'un trait de critique qui l Eclaire que des plus grands
Eloges. […] Voize trés humble et trés obeissant Serviteur Bellin". For analysis and English translation, see
Pastoureau (1993), who explains that Bellin sent the letter with his Atlas Maritime "to London in 1752 as
part of his candidacy file toward election to the eminent scientific society." | |||||
| Note 38 | SIZES OF MAPSHEETS & VIEWS OF STATE 1: | |||||
| SHEET | Engraved | COL. 1 | COL. 2 | COL. 3 | COL. 4 | |
| No. | Surface | 667 mm | 685 mm | 685 mm | 298 mm | |
| ROW 1 | 492 mm | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| ROW 2 | 492 mm | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
| ROW 3 | 492 mm | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
| ROW 4 | 489 mm | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | |
| ROW 5 | 436 mm | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | |
| SIZE OF VIEWS (width x height in mm) | POPPLE | C&M | ||||
| NEW YORK | 265 x 121 | 263 x 121 | ||||
| QUEBEC | 265 x 132 | 263 x 131 | ||||
| MEXICO CITY | 273 x 121 | 268 x 121 | ||||
| NIAGARA FALLS | 273 x 132 | 268 x 131 | ||||
| Note 39 | A review of copy C7 of the 20-sheet map at the Public Record Office in England shows that the title banner
was printed from 3 separate plates, each on a separate piece of paper, joined together and pasted above
border of map. The size of the platemark (each piece of paper being somewhat larger) and the text on each
plate is: Plate 1 - "AMERI" (450 mm wide x 75 mm high); Plate 2 - "CA SEPTENTRIO" (710 mm wide x
75 mm high); Plate 3 - "NALIS." (440 mm wide x 75 mm high). | |||||
| Note 40 | MAPS BY JOHANN CONRAD BACK. (Kuchar 1959): Bernard Pavel [Paul] Moll (1697 - 1780) was a
map collector whose holdings were assembled into two multi-volume "atlases" now at a Czech university
library. The one containing Back's maps is "ATLAS GERMANICUS". The 6 maps listed below are from
this "atlas" and contain Back's [Baeck's] name. The first five maps were probably taken from an atlas
published by Back entitled "Friedrichs Kriegs-Theater". Although "Friedrichs Kriegs-Theater" appears to
be published in Augsburg some, if not all, of Back's maps were engraved in Frankfurt ["Frankfurth"]. The
maps: (1) Bataille de Bergen pres de Franckfort [sic] gagnee par S.E. le duc de Broglie, Sur S.A. le pr.
Ferdinand, le 13. Avril, 1759. Des. et grave par J.C. Back, Frankf. [map 78(1) vol. VII]. 32 cm x 22 cm.;
(2) Plan de Bataille, welche am 13ten April 1759 bey Franckf., zwischen Bergen und Filbel … [map 78(2)
vol. VII]. 27 cm x 18 cm.; (3) Plan de la bataille du 14. Octobre 1758 a Hochkirchen en Lusace. J.C.
Baeck sc. [map 96c(2) vol. XII]. 25 cm x 13 cm.; (4) Plan de la bataille, qui s'est donnee le 25 d'aout 1758
entre l'armee de l'Imper. de Russie et celle de R. de Preusse pres de Zorndorf dans le Nov. Brandenburg.
J.C. Baeck sc. [map 31c(2) vol. XIV]. 24 cm x 14 cm.; (5) Les environs de Cassel et le plan de la bataille
le 10. Octobre 1758. Back sc. Frankfurth. [map 49 vol. VII]. 25 cm x 17.5 cm.; (6) Partie septentrionale du
landgraviat de Hesse-Cassel avec les pays voisins … 1760 … par Carlet de la Rozerie … 1:200 000. Grave
par J.C. Back a Frankfurth. Frankfurt n. Moh., Henry Louis Broenner, 1760. [map 9c vol. VII]. 83 cm x 50
cm. The following 2 maps engraved by Back were located at the British Library: (7) "PLAN DU CHATEAU
DE || HARBURG. || Rheinländische Ruthen. […] J.C. Back, sc.", c.1760 ?. Size: 269 mm width x 267 mm
height. BL Cat No.: *30248.(1). This is the map referenced by Tooley (1979); (8) "PLAN || du siége || du ||
CHATEAU || de || DILENBURG || dressé par I.H. de Pfau || 1760. […] Back sc ", 1760. Size: 242 mm
width x 225 mm height. 7 lines of text at bottom, below border, ending with - "… A Francfort ches H.I.
Broéner aupres la cathedrale". BL Cat. No.: *29095.(15.) | |||||
| Note 41 | GEORGE FOSTER'S 1740 WAR OF JENKINS' EAR MAP. Title: "The Seat of WAR in the WEST
INDIES, containing || New & Accurate Plans of the HAVANA, LA VERA CRUZ, CARTAGENA and
PUERTO BELLO (taken from Spanish draughts) also of SAN AUGUSTIN and the Bay of Honda in Cuba;
with Prospects of the two first, one by Adm.l Vernon the || other by Capt.n Pearson: likewise a Chart or Map
of the West Indies, exhibiting the Situation of those and other noted Ports with respect to the Gulf of
Florida; the course of the Galleons and Flota, which are under a necessity of passing thro this Gulf in their
re- || turn to Europe; the Windward Passage & the Parts where the Guarda Costas hover to intercept our
Ships; in order to demonstrate that the Havana is the only Place the possession of which can possibly
secure our Trade to the West Indies, and prevent the Spanish depredations." Imprint at bottom right at end
of 4 lines of text: "Published pursuant to Act of Parliament Feb.9. 1739.40 by G. Foster at the White Horse
in St. Pauls Church Yard." Imprint within inset map of CARTAGENA [Kapp(b) No. 63]: "E. Bowen Sc."
Main map has title in bottom right corner - "A Map or Chart of the WEST INDIES, drawn from the best
Spanish Maps, and regulated by Astronomical Observations". The main map contains an annotation below
title: "NB There will soon be Published a large & Accurate sheet Map of ye same Parts, with Plans of Citys
Harbours and other Improvements". Size of whole SEAT OF WAR collage: within borders, excluding text
at top and bottom: 463 mm wide x 394 mm high. Size of main Map or Chart of the WEST INDIES: 298
mm wide x 168 mm high. Size of The Harbour of PUERTO BELLO map: 164 mm wide x 168 mm high.
(Kapp 1971a, No. 55). George Foster's inset map of the West Indies, compared with Popple's map, has the
same delineation of the coasts of Florida and the north and west coasts of the Gulf of Mexico. It shows the
same delineation of rivers inland. However, it has a slightly different delineation of the coastline between
La Vera Cruz and CARACAS, and the Pacific coastline from S. Salvador to the south. It also shows "N.
Orleans" (in "LOUYSIANA" [sic]), not present on Popple's map. THE SEAT OF WAR contains a "Table
Comparing this Map with MR Popple's Great Map, and the rest lately republished".
In July 1740 Emanuel Bowen published "A SEQUEL to the Seat of WAR in the WEST INDIES,
Containing: (1) a Map of the Isthmus of Panamá, exhibiting the Roads, with the course of the River Châgré
thro the same (2) Curious Perfpective Views of the Harbour, Town, and Castles of Puerto Bello, as sent
over by Commodore Brown (3) the Appearance at Sea of San Juan de Puerto Rico, with it's Castles from
Admiral Vernon's own draught. the whole illustrated with remarks." "Published pursuant to Act of
Parliament July 8.th 1740 by E. Bowen Sold by Geo: Foster at ye White Horse in S.t Pauls Church Yard
London." "E. Bowen Sculp." (Kapp 1971a, No. 59; BL Cat. No.: K CXXIV/21). Size: 356 mm width x 445
mm height - within borders. This Bowen map is not a copy of Popple's map. Bowen's map was advertised
in THE LONDON DAILY POST, AND GENERAL ADVERTISER of July 8, 1740 and THE GENERAL
EVENING POST of July 10-12, 1740 announcing that it contains "a Table comparing the Map with Mr.
Popple's." See Note 35. Location of Foster and Bowen's maps: British Library, Map Library. | |||||
| Note 42 | PHILIPPE BUACHE'S 3 MAPS OF SOUTHERN NEWFOUNDLAND:
(1) Buache's copy of Popple (February 1741) - Title in box within borders at bottom-center: "CARTE de la partie Meridionale de L'ISLE DE TERRE NEUVE || Avec l'ISLE ROYALE nommée cy-devant Bacallao, Gaspée, ou du Cap Breton, || Et l'Isle de Sable Tirées de l'Amerique en 20. f.les de M.r Popple. || On a donné séparem.t cette même Carte comparée avec celle dont le Plan a été rectifié || Par Philippe Buache. || Fevrier 1741." At bottom right corner, within borders, engraved "N.o 3". Imprint below bottom border at center: "A PARIS sur le Quay de la Megisserie. Avec Privilege du Roy". Imprint below bottom border at right: "Desbruslins Sculpsit." Size between borders - 313 mm width x 235 mm height. (Tooley 1985, No. 94.3). LOCATION: HARVARD, in composite copy of V | |||||