University of Southern Maine is a premier Educator Preparation Provider (EPP) serving local Maine P-12 educational communities and beyond. Our educator preparation programs prepare students (known as “candidates”) who seek to enter education-related professions. See below for information about USM’s educator preparation programs, the EPP accreditation status, and data related to program quality and effectiveness.

The following programs were reviewed by teams representing the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) and the Maine State Board of Education in Fall 2021, with accreditation granted in Spring 2022.

Initial-Level Licensure Programs

*The program names in this table are presented as they were reviewed and accredited by CAEP and the Maine State Board of Education in Spring 2022. Revisions to Maine Chapter 115 in June 2022 changed elementary licensure to K-6, secondary to 6-12, and K-12 licensure areas to PK-12, with the exception of special education. Our programs have been phasing in grade level changes in accordance with Chapter 115.

Advanced-Level Licensure Programs

^The program names in this table are presented as they were reviewed and accredited by CAEP and the Maine State Board of Education in Spring 2022. Revisions to Maine Chapter 115 in June 2022 related to advanced programs changed School Counseling licensure to PK-12.

USM’s educator preparation programs were approved by the Accreditation Council of the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) in May 2022 and by the Maine State Board of Education in September 2022. Accreditation is granted to the programs listed above, at the initial-licensure level and the advanced level, effective Spring 2022 through Spring 2029.

CAEP accreditation standards can be found at the following link: 

CAEP Revised 2022 Standards for Initial Level Programs (One-Pager)

CAEP Revised 2022 Standards for Advanced Level Programs (One-Pager)

USM’s educator preparation programs were most recently reviewed in 2021 under the 2013 standards.

Completers of initial level programs who are currently teaching in the field report feeling well or very well prepared to utilize multiple forms of assessments and differentiate instruction to support multi language learners, and students with the full-range of learner readiness.

ETEP & UG Novice Educator Initial Data Tables
Table 1.1n=7
IndicatorNot at all prepared (1)Somewhat prepared (2)Well prepared
(3)
Very well prepared (4)NA
3.5 Use technology in the classroom appropriately to support instruction.005 (72%)2 (28%)0
4.1 Engage in ongoing professional learning to provide all learners with engaging learning experiences.01 (14%)4 (58%)2 (28%)0
4.3 Reflect on teaching practice to improve instruction.005 (72%)2 (28%)0
Table 1.2n = 7
IndicatorNot at all prepared (1)Somewhat prepared (2)Well prepared (3)Very well prepared (4)NA
2.3 Integrate cross-disciplinary skills (e.g., critical thinking, problem solving, creativity, communication) to help learners use content.02 (28%)3 (44%)2 (28%)0
3.4a Differentiate instruction for students with disabilities.01 (14%)4 (58%)2 (28%)0
3.4b Differentiate instruction for English language learners.1 (14%)1 (14%)3 (44%)2 (28%)0

Completers of initial level programs who are currently teaching in the field report feeling well or very well prepared to utilize multiple forms of assessments and differentiate instruction to support multi language learners, and students with the full-range of learner readiness.

Employer & Stakeholder survey was replaced with a stakeholder roundtable discussion. See Round Table Discussion notes.

ETEP & UG Exit Survey Initial Data Tables
Table 1.1n=24
IndicatorNot at all prepared (1)Somewhat prepared (2)Well prepared
(3)
Very well prepared (4)
3.5 Use technology in the classroom appropriately to support instruction.007 (29%)17 (69%)
4.1 Engage in ongoing professional learning to provide all learners with engaging learning experiences.006 (25%)18 (75%)
4.3 Reflect on teaching practice to improve instruction.005 (21%)19 (79%)
Table 1.2n = 24
IndicatorNot at all prepared (1)Somewhat prepared (2)Well prepared (3)Very well prepared (4)
2.3 Integrate cross-disciplinary skills (e.g., critical thinking, problem solving, creativity, communication) to help learners use content.1 (4%)09 (36%)14 (60%)
3.4a Differentiate instruction for students with disabilities.02 (8%)8 (32%)14 (60%)
3.4b Differentiate instruction for English language learners.009 (36%)15 ((64%)

Employment

The employment survey was sent to Initial-level licensure program completers in May 2025 (with follow-up reminders throughout summer 2025). 38 completed the survey to report employment in their field (40.4% survey completion rate).

Highlights:

  • At completion, 84.2% of respondents reported full-time employment in the education field
  • At completion, 88.9% of respondents reported employment as teachers

Table 3.1 Type of employment

Full-TimePart-TimeTemporary (sub)Not employed
84%5%5%5%
Total n = 38

Table 3.2 Position title

TeacherEd Tech IIISubstitute teacherOther staff
89%3%3%6%
Total n = 36

The Office of Educator Preparation is developing instruments to collect employment information for advanced program completers, in collaboration with program faculty and external partners.

Contact the Office of Educator Preparation with any questions, comments, or concerns at usm.oep@maine.edu or (207) 780-5055.